
Adopted by the Council of Justices of the Supreme People’s Court on December 24, 2025 and promulgated under Decision No. 329a/QĐ-CA dated December 25, 2025 of the Chief Justice of the Supreme People’s Court.
Source of the case law:
Cassation Decision No. 13/2022/KDTM-GĐT dated December 12, 2022 of the Council of Justices of the Supreme People’s Court regarding the business and commercial case “Dispute over a service contract” between the plaintiff, Company M, and the defendant, Joint Stock Company A.
Location of the case law content:
Paragraphs 5 and 6 of the section “The Court’s Assessment.”
Summary of the case law content:
Case law situation:
The parties entered into and performed a service contract, and subsequently agreed to terminate the contract. The plaintiff (the service provider) requested the defendant (the service user) to pay the service fees; the defendant agreed to make payment but failed to do so. Consequently, the plaintiff initiated a lawsuit before the Court requesting the defendant to pay the outstanding amount. The defendant requested the application of the statute of limitations for initiating a lawsuit.
Legal solution:
In this case, the Court must determine that the dispute between the parties is a civil dispute concerning the recovery of property and that the statute of limitations for initiating a lawsuit shall not apply.
Relevant legal provisions:
Clause 2, Article 155 of the Civil Code 2015.
Keywords of the case law:
“Service contract”; “Recovery of property”; “Non-application of the statute of limitations.”
Link for reading: CASELAW No 81/2025/AL
.jpg)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Articles
- BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY (ABRIDGED TENTH EDITION) BY BRYAN A.GARNER
- CẤU TRÚC “NOT ONLY … BUT ALSO …”
- THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE DEAL: THE STRUCTURES THAT DEFINES A DECADE OF GLOBAL M&A BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC
- ACADEMIC LEGAL WRITING: LAW REVIEW ARTICLES, STUDENT NOTES, SEMINAR PAPERS, AND GETTING ON LAW REVIEW BY EUGENE VOLOKH
- THE CONTRACT COMPASS BASIS PRINCIPLES FOR DRAFTING AND READING EVERY AGREEMENT BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC
- CÔNG VĂN 7751/BNG-LS CỦA BỘ NGOẠI GIAO NGÀY 03 THÁNG 09 NĂM 2026 VỀ VIỆC TRIỂN KHAI THỰC HIỆN CÔNG ƯỚC APOSTILLE
- PRIVATE M&A NEGOTIATION A PRACTITIONER'S COMPANION TO THE SHARE PURCHASE, SUBSCRIPTION & SHAREHOLDER'S AGREEMENT BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC
- LITIGATION IN TWO WORLDS CIVIL AND CORMMERCIAL COURT PROCEDURE IN VIETNAM AND THE UNITED STATES: A PRACTITIONER'S COMPARATIVE GUIDE BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC
- HƯỚNG DẪN THỰC HIỆN LUẬT THƯƠNG MẠI ĐIỆN TỬ VÀ NGHỊ ĐỊNH 248/2026/NĐ-CP
- THE M&A DICTIONARY BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC
- THE CAMBRIDGE HANDBOOK OF PRIVATE LAW AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE EDITED BY ERNEST LIM AND PHILLIP MORGAN
- ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EDITED BY JYH-AN LEE, RETO M HILTY, AND KUNG-CHUNG LIU
- ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE LAW CYBERCRIME AND CRIMINAL LIABILITY EDITED BY DENNIS J. BAKER AND PAUL H. ROBINSON
- ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN LEGAL SYSTEMS (BRIDGING LAW AND TECHNOLOGY THROUGH AI) EDITED BY ERIONA CELA, NARASIMHA RAO VAJJHALA AND BEHROUZ ASLANI
- NGHỊ ĐỊNH 342/2026/NĐ-CP QUY ĐỊNH CHI TIẾT LUẬT THƯƠNG MẠI VÀ LUẬT QUẢN LÝ NGOẠI THƯƠNG VỀ HOẠT ĐỘNG MUA BÁN HÀNG HOÁ VÀ HOẠT ĐỘNG LIÊN QUAN TRỰC TIẾP ĐẾN MUA BÁN HÀNG HOÁ CỦA NHÀ ĐẦU TƯ NƯỚC NGOÀI, TỔ CHỨC KINH TẾ CÓ VỐN ĐẦU TƯ NƯỚC NGOÀI TẠI VIỆT NAM
- THE LAW OF INTERNATIONAL LAWYERS BY WOUTER WERNER, MARIEKE DE HOON AND ALEXIS GALÁN



