.png)
Legal situation: My company, Transport Company X, has entered into a contract with Company C. The signed contract includes a provision for dispute resolution through an "arbitration agreement." However, due to a dispute arising among the parties, we prefer not to resort to commercial arbitration but instead file a lawsuit directly in a competent court. Is this permissible? Thank you.
FDVN Opinion:
It is regulated in Article 6 of Commercial Arbitration Law 2010 about the instances where the court declines jurisdiction in the presence of a specific arbitration agreement: In case the disputing parties have reached an arbitration agreement but one party initiates a lawsuit at a court, the court shall refuse to accept the case, unless the arbitration agreement is invalid or unrealizable.
The invalidation of arbitration agreements is stipulated in Article 18 of Commercial Arbitration Law 2010, which includes the following cases: 1. Disputes arise in the domains falling beyond the arbitrator's jurisdiction defined in Article 2 of this Law. 2. The arbitration agreement maker has no competence defined by law. 3. The arbitration agreement maker has no civil act capacity under the Civil Code. 4. The form of the arbitration agreement is incompliant with Article 16 of this Law. 5. A party is deceived, intimidated or compelled in the course of making the arbitration agreement and requests a declaration that such arbitration agreement is invalid. 6. The arbitration agreement breaches prohibitions specified by law.
Meanwhile, the unenforceable arbitration agreements are governed by the provisions in Article 4 of Resolution No. 01/2014/NQ-HĐTP, which stipulates:
Article 4. The arbitration agreement is not viable as prescribed in Article 6 of LCA as follows:
“The arbitration agreement is not viable” as prescribed in Clause 6 Article 18 of LCA means any arbitration agreement in the cases below:
1. The parties concerned have an agreement to resolve their disputes at a specific arbitration center which has now shut down without any arbitration center that inherits its cases, and the parties concerned fail to reach an agreement on another arbitration center to resolve their disputes.
2. Both parties have an agreement on appointment of a specific arbitrator to resolve disputes, but when the dispute arises, because of force majeure events or objective difficulties, such arbitrator cannot resolve the case, or the arbitration center or court cannot find a substitute arbitrator as agreed by the parties concerned, and the parties concerned also fail to reach an agreement to select a substitute arbitrator.
3. Both parties have an agreement on appointment of a specific arbitrator to resolve disputes, but when the dispute arises, such arbitrator refuses the appointment or the arbitration center refuses the arbitrator appointment, and the parties concerned also fail to reach an agreement to select a substitute arbitrator.
4. The parties concerned have an agreement to resolve their disputes at a specific arbitration center but a set of arbitration rules of another arbitration center, which is different from the arbitration rules of the agreed arbitration center, is applied, the charter of the arbitration selected by both party does not allow the application of arbitration rules of other arbitration centers, and the parties concerned fail to reach an agreement on substitute set of arbitration rules.
5. The goods/service seller and consumers have an overall agreement on provision of goods/services that contain arbitration terms drafted by the seller as prescribed in Article 17 of LCA, but the consumers refuse to have the dispute that arises resolved by an arbitral tribunal.
Furthermore, as stipulated in Clause 1, Article 43 of the Commercial Arbitration Law concerning the consideration of invalid arbitration agreements, unenforceable arbitration agreements, the authority of the Arbitration Council is: Before considering the circumstances of a dispute, the arbitration council shall consider the validity of the arbitration agreement and whether such agreement can be realized, and consider its jurisdiction. If the dispute falls within its jurisdiction, the arbitration council shall settle it under this Law. If the dispute falls beyond its jurisdiction or the arbitration agreement is invalid or unrealizable, the arbitration council shall decide to terminate the dispute settlement and immediately notify the parties thereof.
According to the information provided, the Contract signed between the two companies includes an agreement for dispute resolution through arbitration. Therefore, if both parties do not mutually agree to litigate in court instead of using the agreed arbitration body, and your company submits a lawsuit directly to the court without involving the Arbitration Center, the court will dismiss the lawsuit on the grounds that the parties have previously agreed to arbitration, except in cases where the arbitration agreement is invalid or unenforceable.
Nguyen Thi Hai Nhi - FDVN law firm
(1).jpg)
CONTACT US:
Lawyers in Da Nang:
99 Nguyen Huu Tho, Quan Hai Chau, Da Nang city
Lawyers in Hue:
366 Phan Chu Trinh, Hue City, Thua Thien Hue
Lawyers in Ho Chi Minh City:
No. 122 Dinh Bo Linh Street, Binh Thanh District, Ho Chi Minh City
Lawyers in Ha Noi:
Room 501, 5th Floor, No. 11, Lane No. 183, Dang Tien Dong Street, Dong Da District, Ha Noi
Lawyers in Nghe An:
No. 19 V.I Lenin street, Vinh City, Nghe An Province
Website: www.fdvn.vn www.fdvnlawfirm.vn www.diendanngheluat.vn www.tuvanphapluatdanang.com
Email: fdvnlawfirm@gmail.com luatsulecao@gmail.com
Phone: 0935 643 666 – 0906 499 446
Fanpage LUẬT SƯ FDVN: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirm/
Legal Service For Expat: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirmvietnam/
TỦ SÁCH NGHỀ LUẬT: https://www.facebook.com/SayMeNgheLuat/
DIỄN ĐÀN NGHỀ LUẬT: https://www.facebook.com/groups/saymengheluat/
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/c/luatsufdvn
Telegram: https://t.me/luatsufdvn
Group “Legal forum for foreigners in Vietnam”: https://www.facebook.com/groups/legalforeignersinvietnam
Other Articles
- LEARNING ENGLISH WITH FDVN LAWFIRM: BÀI TẬP NGỮ PHÁP TIẾNG ANH IELTS CƠ BẢN
- THÔNG TƯ SỐ 38/2026/TT-BTC CỦA BỘ TÀI CHÍNH: QUY ĐỊNH MẪU VĂN BẢN, BÁO CÁO VỀ ĐẦU TƯ RA NƯỚC NGOÀI CÓ HIỆU LỰC TỪ NGÀY 15/04/2026
- CẤU TRÚC IN CASE
- HỢP ĐỒNG CHUYỂN NHƯỢNG QUYỀN SỬ DỤNG ĐẤT VÔ HIỆU DO NHẦM LẪN, GIẢ TẠO TRONG GIAO DỊCH DÂN SỰ: TỒN TẠI VÀ KIẾN NGHỊ HOÀN THIỆN
- CÓ THỂ SỬ DỤNG BITCOIN LÀM PHƯƠNG TIỆN THANH TOÁN TẠI VIỆT NAM HAY KHÔNG? / CAN BITCOIN BE USED AS A MEANS OF PAYMENT IN VIETNAM?
- INFOGRAPHIC 08 TRƯỜNG HỢP ĐƯỢC TẠM HOÃN GỌI NHẬP NGŨ / INFOGRAPHIC 08 CASES POSTPONEMENT FROM CONSCRIPTION
- BÀI HỌC TIẾNG ANH PHÁP LÝ: ARRANGE
- NGHỊ QUYẾT 15/2026/NQ-CP VỀ VIỆC TẠM NGƯNG HIỆU LỰC NGHỊ ĐỊNH SỐ 46/2026/NĐ-CP NGÀY 26/01/2026 VÀ NGHỊ QUYẾT SỐ 66.13/2026/NQ-CP NGÀY 27/01/2026 CỦA CHÍNH PHỦ
- NGHỊ ĐỊNH 103/2026/NĐ-CP QUY ĐỊNH VỀ ĐẦU TƯ RA NƯỚC NGOÀI CÓ HIỆU LỰC TỪ NGÀY 03/04/2026
- PHÂN BIỆT GET SOMETHING DONE VÀ HAVE SOMETHING DONE
- TRƯNG CẦU GIÁM ĐỊNH BỔ SUNG TRONG TỐ TỤNG HÌNH SỰ VIỆT NAM / SUPPLEMENTARY EXPERT EXAMINATION IN VIETNAMESE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
- BRING ĐI VỚI GIỚI TỪ GÌ?
- CẤU TRÚC IT IS NO USE
- THE ISSUE OF JUDGMENT DEBTORS WITHOUT CONDITIONS FOR ENFORCEMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LEGAL IMPROVEMENT / VẤN ĐỀ NGƯỜI PHẢI THI HÀNH ÁN KHÔNG ĐỦ ĐIỀU KIỆN THI HÀNH ÁN VÀ KIẾN NGHỊ HOÀN THIỆN PHÁP LUẬT
- MỘT SỐ VẤN ĐỀ PHÁP LÝ VỀ TÀI SẢN KHI NAM, NỮ SỐNG CHUNG NHƯ VỢ CHỒNG MÀ KHÔNG ĐĂNG KÝ KẾT HÔN / LEGAL ISSUES CONCERNING PROPERTY WHEN A MAN AND A WOMAN COHABIT AS HUSBAND AND WIFE WITHOUT MARRIAGE REGISTRATION
- YÊU CẦU THI HÀNH ÁN ĐỐI VỚI VỤ ÁN HÀNH CHÍNH Ở ĐÂU? / WHERE ARE A REQUEST FOR ENFORCEMENT OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGMENT FILED?



