.png)
Legal situation: My company, Transport Company X, has entered into a contract with Company C. The signed contract includes a provision for dispute resolution through an "arbitration agreement." However, due to a dispute arising among the parties, we prefer not to resort to commercial arbitration but instead file a lawsuit directly in a competent court. Is this permissible? Thank you.
FDVN Opinion:
It is regulated in Article 6 of Commercial Arbitration Law 2010 about the instances where the court declines jurisdiction in the presence of a specific arbitration agreement: In case the disputing parties have reached an arbitration agreement but one party initiates a lawsuit at a court, the court shall refuse to accept the case, unless the arbitration agreement is invalid or unrealizable.
The invalidation of arbitration agreements is stipulated in Article 18 of Commercial Arbitration Law 2010, which includes the following cases: 1. Disputes arise in the domains falling beyond the arbitrator's jurisdiction defined in Article 2 of this Law. 2. The arbitration agreement maker has no competence defined by law. 3. The arbitration agreement maker has no civil act capacity under the Civil Code. 4. The form of the arbitration agreement is incompliant with Article 16 of this Law. 5. A party is deceived, intimidated or compelled in the course of making the arbitration agreement and requests a declaration that such arbitration agreement is invalid. 6. The arbitration agreement breaches prohibitions specified by law.
Meanwhile, the unenforceable arbitration agreements are governed by the provisions in Article 4 of Resolution No. 01/2014/NQ-HĐTP, which stipulates:
Article 4. The arbitration agreement is not viable as prescribed in Article 6 of LCA as follows:
“The arbitration agreement is not viable” as prescribed in Clause 6 Article 18 of LCA means any arbitration agreement in the cases below:
1. The parties concerned have an agreement to resolve their disputes at a specific arbitration center which has now shut down without any arbitration center that inherits its cases, and the parties concerned fail to reach an agreement on another arbitration center to resolve their disputes.
2. Both parties have an agreement on appointment of a specific arbitrator to resolve disputes, but when the dispute arises, because of force majeure events or objective difficulties, such arbitrator cannot resolve the case, or the arbitration center or court cannot find a substitute arbitrator as agreed by the parties concerned, and the parties concerned also fail to reach an agreement to select a substitute arbitrator.
3. Both parties have an agreement on appointment of a specific arbitrator to resolve disputes, but when the dispute arises, such arbitrator refuses the appointment or the arbitration center refuses the arbitrator appointment, and the parties concerned also fail to reach an agreement to select a substitute arbitrator.
4. The parties concerned have an agreement to resolve their disputes at a specific arbitration center but a set of arbitration rules of another arbitration center, which is different from the arbitration rules of the agreed arbitration center, is applied, the charter of the arbitration selected by both party does not allow the application of arbitration rules of other arbitration centers, and the parties concerned fail to reach an agreement on substitute set of arbitration rules.
5. The goods/service seller and consumers have an overall agreement on provision of goods/services that contain arbitration terms drafted by the seller as prescribed in Article 17 of LCA, but the consumers refuse to have the dispute that arises resolved by an arbitral tribunal.
Furthermore, as stipulated in Clause 1, Article 43 of the Commercial Arbitration Law concerning the consideration of invalid arbitration agreements, unenforceable arbitration agreements, the authority of the Arbitration Council is: Before considering the circumstances of a dispute, the arbitration council shall consider the validity of the arbitration agreement and whether such agreement can be realized, and consider its jurisdiction. If the dispute falls within its jurisdiction, the arbitration council shall settle it under this Law. If the dispute falls beyond its jurisdiction or the arbitration agreement is invalid or unrealizable, the arbitration council shall decide to terminate the dispute settlement and immediately notify the parties thereof.
According to the information provided, the Contract signed between the two companies includes an agreement for dispute resolution through arbitration. Therefore, if both parties do not mutually agree to litigate in court instead of using the agreed arbitration body, and your company submits a lawsuit directly to the court without involving the Arbitration Center, the court will dismiss the lawsuit on the grounds that the parties have previously agreed to arbitration, except in cases where the arbitration agreement is invalid or unenforceable.
Nguyen Thi Hai Nhi - FDVN law firm
(1).jpg)
CONTACT US:
Lawyers in Da Nang:
99 Nguyen Huu Tho, Quan Hai Chau, Da Nang city
Lawyers in Hue:
366 Phan Chu Trinh, Hue City, Thua Thien Hue
Lawyers in Ho Chi Minh City:
No. 122 Dinh Bo Linh Street, Binh Thanh District, Ho Chi Minh City
Lawyers in Ha Noi:
Room 501, 5th Floor, No. 11, Lane No. 183, Dang Tien Dong Street, Dong Da District, Ha Noi
Lawyers in Nghe An:
No. 19 V.I Lenin street, Vinh City, Nghe An Province
Website: www.fdvn.vn www.fdvnlawfirm.vn www.diendanngheluat.vn www.tuvanphapluatdanang.com
Email: fdvnlawfirm@gmail.com luatsulecao@gmail.com
Phone: 0935 643 666 – 0906 499 446
Fanpage LUẬT SƯ FDVN: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirm/
Legal Service For Expat: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirmvietnam/
TỦ SÁCH NGHỀ LUẬT: https://www.facebook.com/SayMeNgheLuat/
DIỄN ĐÀN NGHỀ LUẬT: https://www.facebook.com/groups/saymengheluat/
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/c/luatsufdvn
Telegram: https://t.me/luatsufdvn
Group “Legal forum for foreigners in Vietnam”: https://www.facebook.com/groups/legalforeignersinvietnam
Other Articles
- HƯỚNG DẪN CÁCH TÍNH ƯU ĐÃI THUẾ THU NHẬP CÁ NHÂN ĐỐI VỚI CHUYÊN GIA, NHÀ KHOA HỌC LÀM VIỆC TRONG LĨNH VỰC KHỞI NGHIỆP SÁNG TẠO / GUIDANCE ON CALCULATING PERSONAL INCOME TAX INCENTIVES FOR EXPERTS AND SCIENTISTS WORKING IN THE FIELD OF INNOVATIVE STARTUPS
- LAW SCHOOL FOR EVERYONE LEGISLATION AND REGULATION BY PROFESSOR PETER J.SMITH
- SINH CON THỨ HAI TỪ NGÀY 01/7/2026: THỜI GIAN NGHỈ VÀ CÁCH TÍNH TIỀN THAI SẢN / SECOND CHILDBIRTH FROM JULY 1, 2026: MATERNITY LEAVE PERIOD AND CALCULATION OF MATERNITY BENEFITS
- LAW SCHOOL FOR EVERYONE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW BY PROFESSOR ERIC BERGER
- TỔNG HỢP TỪ VỰNG VÀ THUẬT NGỮ PHÁP LÝ TIẾNG ANH THÔNG DỤNG DÀNH CHO HÔN NHÂN GIA ĐÌNH
- LAW SCHOOL FOR EVERYONE CONTRACTS BY PROFESSOR DAVID HORTON
- LAW SCHOOL FOR EVERYONE CORPORATE LAW BY PROFESSOR GEORGE S. GEIS
- TỔNG HỢP 08 BẢN ÁN CỦA TOÀ ÁN VƯƠNG QUỐC ANH VỀ TRANH CHẤP LIÊN QUAN ĐẾN DỮ LIỆU CÁ NHÂN / COLLECTION OF 08 UK COURT JUDGMENTS ON DISPUTES RELATING TO PERSONAL DATA
- TỔNG HỢP 12 BẢN ÁN CỦA TOÀ ÁN SINGAPORE VỀ TRANH CHẤP CÔNG NGHỆ VÀ SỞ HỮU TRÍ TUỆ / 12 SINGAPORE COURTS JUDGMENTS ON TECHNOLOGY AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DISPUTES
- TỔNG HỢP MỘT SỐ MẪU ĐƠN KHỞI KIỆN DÂN SỰ TRÊN THẾ GIỚI / COLLECTION OF CIVIL STATEMENT OF CLAIM TEMLATES FROM OVER THE WORLD
- BỘ TÀI LIỆU HƯỚNG DẪN THỦ TỤC HÀNH CHÍNH VỀ ĐĂNG KÝ QUYỀN TÁC GIẢ, QUYỀN LIÊN QUAN CỦA CỤC CÔNG NGHIỆP VĂN HOÁ VÀ BẢN QUYỀN TÁC GIẢ - BỘ VĂN HOÁ, THỂ THAO VÀ DU LỊCH
- THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PLAYBOOK: POWERS, RESPONSIBILITES AND INTERACTIONS BETWEEN SHAREHOLDERS, BOARD AND MANAGEMENT BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC
- ĐÀ NẴNG: DOANH NGHIỆP CẦN HOÀN THÀNH KÊ KHAI THÔNG TIN CHỦ SỞ HỮU HƯỞNG LỢI TRƯỚC NGÀY 30/11/2026 THEO CÔNG VĂN 14848/STC-DN&ĐKKD
- BÀI HỌC TIẾNG ANH PHÁP LÝ: APPEAL
- NGHỊ ĐỊNH 393/2026/NĐ-CP QUY ĐỊNH VỀ NGƯỜI LAO ĐỘNG NƯỚC NGOÀI LÀM VIỆC TẠI VIỆT NAM
- DOING BUSINESS IN VIETNAM: A GUIDE TO THE REASONING, NOT THE RULES SO THAT WHEN THE LAW CHANGES, YOU ALREADY KNOW WHERE TO LOOK BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC



