"Nowadays, all this is past, in medical science. As to the causes of disease, we know that they are facts of nature,—various, but distinguishable by diagnosis and research, and more or less capable of prevention or control or counteraction. As to the treatment, we now know that there are various specific modes of treatment for specific causes or symptoms, and that the treatment must be adapted to the cause. In short, the individualization of disease, in cause and in treatment, is the dominant truth of modern medical science. The same truth is now known about crime; but the understanding and the application of it are just opening upon us. The old and still dominant thought is, as to cause, that a crime is caused by the inscrutable moral free will of the human being, doing or not doing the crime, just as it pleases; absolutely free in advance, at any moment of time, to choose or not to choose the criminal act, and therefore in itself the sole and ultimate cause of crime. As to treatment, there still are just two traditional measures, used in varying doses for all kinds of crime and all kinds of persons,— jail, or a fine (for death is now employed in rare cases only). But modern science, here as in medicine, recognizes that crime also (like disease) has natural causes. It need not be asserted for one moment that crime is a disease. But it does have natural causes,— that is, circumstances which work to produce it in a given case.
And as to treatment, modern science recognizes that penal or remedial treatment cannot possibly be indiscriminate and machine-like, but must be adapted to the causes, and to the man as affected by those causes. Common sense and logic alike require, inevitably, that the moment we predicate a specific cause for an undesirable effect, the remedial treatment must be specifically adapted to that cause. Thus the great truth of the present and the future, for criminal science, is the individualization of penal treatment,—for that man, and for the cause of that man’s crime". (According to the author of this book)
The contents of shared books and materials express the authors' point of view, not FDVN Lawyers'. We back up and store them for academic and non-commercial purposes. We object to using these books and materials for commercial purposes.
Link for ebook: Criminal Psychology
Other Articles
- CÔNG VĂN 7751/BNG-LS CỦA BỘ NGOẠI GIAO NGÀY 03 THÁNG 09 NĂM 2026 VỀ VIỆC TRIỂN KHAI THỰC HIỆN CÔNG ƯỚC APOSTILLE
- PRIVATE M&A NEGOTIATION A PRACTITIONER'S COMPANION TO THE SHARE PURCHASE, SUBSCRIPTION & SHAREHOLDER'S AGREEMENT BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC
- LITIGATION IN TWO WORLDS CIVIL AND CORMMERCIAL COURT PROCEDURE IN VIETNAM AND THE UNITED STATES: A PRACTITIONER'S COMPARATIVE GUIDE BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC
- HƯỚNG DẪN THỰC HIỆN LUẬT THƯƠNG MẠI ĐIỆN TỬ VÀ NGHỊ ĐỊNH 248/2026/NĐ-CP
- THE M&A DICTIONARY BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC
- THE CAMBRIDGE HANDBOOK OF PRIVATE LAW AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE EDITED BY ERNEST LIM AND PHILLIP MORGAN
- ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EDITED BY JYH-AN LEE, RETO M HILTY, AND KUNG-CHUNG LIU
- ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE LAW CYBERCRIME AND CRIMINAL LIABILITY EDITED BY DENNIS J. BAKER AND PAUL H. ROBINSON
- ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN LEGAL SYSTEMS (BRIDGING LAW AND TECHNOLOGY THROUGH AI) EDITED BY ERIONA CELA, NARASIMHA RAO VAJJHALA AND BEHROUZ ASLANI
- NGHỊ ĐỊNH 342/2026/NĐ-CP QUY ĐỊNH CHI TIẾT LUẬT THƯƠNG MẠI VÀ LUẬT QUẢN LÝ NGOẠI THƯƠNG VỀ HOẠT ĐỘNG MUA BÁN HÀNG HOÁ VÀ HOẠT ĐỘNG LIÊN QUAN TRỰC TIẾP ĐẾN MUA BÁN HÀNG HOÁ CỦA NHÀ ĐẦU TƯ NƯỚC NGOÀI, TỔ CHỨC KINH TẾ CÓ VỐN ĐẦU TƯ NƯỚC NGOÀI TẠI VIỆT NAM
- THE LAW OF INTERNATIONAL LAWYERS BY WOUTER WERNER, MARIEKE DE HOON AND ALEXIS GALÁN
- ABSOLUTE LEGAL ENGLISH BY HELEN CALLANAN AND LYNDA EDWARDS
- THE OXFORD HANDBOOK OF LEGAL STUDIES EDITED BY PETER CANE AND MARK TUSHNET
- DUE DILIGENCE IN THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ORDER EDITED BY HEIKE KRIEGER, ANNE PETERS AND LEONHARD KREUZER
- TỔNG HỢP ĐỀ THI IELTS WRITING 2026
- TỔNG HỢP 10 BẢN ÁN CỦA TOÀ ÁN VƯƠNG QUỐC ANH GIẢI QUYẾT TRANH CHẤP SA THẢI NGƯỜI LAO ĐỘNG / COLLECTION OF 10 JUDGMENTS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM COURTS ON EMPLOYMENT DISMISSAL DISPUTES



