Ms. T and I wrote a purchase paper, according to which I sold all of the watermelons in my field for VND 5,000,000. Mrs. T gave all the money to me and made an appointment that two days later, she will send a person to harvest all watermelons. But that night, there was a flood, so all watermelons were damaged. Mrs. T came to my house to ask for a refund of 5 million VND. Do I have to reimburse the amount received from Mrs. T?
FDVN’s Opinion
Thank you for sending your question to FDVN Law firm. For your question, we have some discussion as follow:
Pursuant to Article 430 The Civil Code 2015 stipulated about the Sale contract of property: “Sale contract means an agreement between parties whereby a seller is obligated to transfer the ownership rights of property to the purchaser and the purchaser is obligated to make a payment to the seller.”
With the information you provided, all watermelons were bought by Mrs. T, also, Mrs.T made a payment and committed to send a person to harvest as well as take it away. However, because of the flood, all watermelons were damaged, It could not be harvested, Mrs. T asked for a refund.
According to Clause 1 Article 441 of the Civil Code 2015 regulated Transfer of risks: “The seller shall bear all risks of the property until the property is delivered to the purchaser, the purchaser shall bear all risks of the property from the time of acceptance of the property, unless otherwise agreed or prescribed by law.”
Accordingly, you are the person who responded to all risks of the property until it transferred.
Besides, Article 62 of the 2005 Commercial Law stipulates the time of transferring ownership of goods as follows:
“Unless otherwise provided for by law or agreed upon by the parties, ownership of goods shall be passed from the seller to the purchaser as from the time of handover of the goods.”
Because there is no agreement between you and Mrs. T so the ownership of watermelons has not yet transferred to Mrs. T. You are the owner and bear all risks of the watermelons.
Base on point b, Clause 1 Article 294 of the 2005 Commercial Law stipulates when a force majeure event occurs that is a case of exemption from liability. Pursuant to Article 156 of the Civil Code 2015: “An event of force majeure is an event which occurs in an objective manner which is not able to be foreseen and which is not able to be remedied by all possible necessary and admissible measures being taken.”
A force majeure event hereby by the flood. However, It cannot take into account when you can be able to be foreseen and which be able to be remedied by all possible necessary and admissible measures being taken when you can monitor weather information, if there is a flood, you must notify the buyer so that you can harvest early, which means you must apply measures within your power to limit the damage. If there are not enough of the above conditions. The flood t is not considered a force majeure event.
Therefore, Mrs.T has the right to ask for a refund. You can make an agreement on a reduction of the amount because the damage caused by flood, unintended by you.
This is FDVN’s opinion related to your request. Hopefully, this opinion will be helpful for you.
Nguyen Thi Lan Anh
FDVN Law Firm
CONTACT US:
Lawyers in Da Nang:
99 Nguyen Huu Tho, Quan Hai Chau, Da Nang city
Lawyers in Hue:
336 Phan Chu Trinh, Hue City, Thua Thien Hue
Lawyers in Phu Quoc:
65 Hung Vuong, Duong Dong town, Phu Quoc island district
Lawyers in Quang Ngai:
359 Nguyen Du, Quang Ngai City, Quang Ngai Province.
Lawyers in Ha Noi
Room 501, 5th Floor, No. 11, Lane No. 183, Dang Tien Dong Street, Dong Da District, Ha Noi
Website: www.fdvn.vn www.fdvnlawfirm.vn www.diendanngheluat.vn www.tuvanphapluatdanang.com
Email: fdvnlawfirm@gmail.com luatsulecao@gmail.com
Phone: 0935 643 666 – 0906 499 446
Fanpage LUẬT SƯ FDVN: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirm/
Other Articles
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 87/2026/AL VỀ THỨ TỰ ƯU TIÊN THANH TOÁN KHI XỬ LÝ TÀI SẢN BẢO ĐẢM / CASE LAW NO. 87/2026/AL ON PRIORITY OF PAYMENT UPON ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY ASSETS
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 88/2026/AL VỀ ỦY QUYỀN THAM GIA TỐ TỤNG TRONG VỤ ÁN TRANH CHẤP VỀ NUÔI CON / CASE LAW NO. 88/2026/AL ON AUTHORIZATION TO PARTICIPATE IN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS IN A CHILD CUSTODY DISPUTE CASE
- BÀI HỌC TIẾNG ANH PHÁP LÝ: CẤU TRÚC UNLESS
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 89/2026/AL VỀ VIỆC BỒI THƯỜNG, HỖ TRỢ KHI NHÀ NƯỚC THU HỒI ĐẤT ĐỐI VỚI TÀI SẢN LÀ NHÀ MUA THANH LÝ ĐỂ Ở TRÊN ĐẤT CỦA CƠ QUAN NHÀ NƯỚC / CASE LAW NO. 89/2026/AL ON COMPENSATION AND SUPPORT UPON STATE RECOVERY OF LAND FOR HOUSES PURCHASED THROUGH L
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 90/2026/AL VỀ THẨM QUYỀN HỦY GIẤY CHỨNG NHẬN QUYỀN SỬ DỤNG ĐẤT CỦA TÒA ÁN / CASE LAW NO. 90/2026/AL RE: ON THE COURT’S AUTHORITY TO REVOKE A LAND USE RIGHTS CERTIFICATE
- TỔNG LƯỢC 08 ÁN LỆ MỚI NHẤT CÓ HIỆU LỰC TỪ NGÀY 01/7/2026 / OVERVIEW OF 8 NEW CASE LAWS EFFECTIVE FROM JULY 1, 2026
- LEARNING LEGAL ENGLISH WITH FDVN LAW FIRM: WHILST AND WHILE
- THỜI HẠN GIAO NỘP TÀI LIỆU, CHỨNG CỨ TRONG VỤ ÁN DÂN SỰ / TIME LIMIT FOR SUBMISSION OF DOCUMENTS AND EVIDENCE IN CIVIL CASES
- THỜI ĐIỂM NỘP VĂN BẢN TRÌNH BÀY Ý KIẾN CỦA BỊ ĐƠN VỀ NỘI DUNG KHỞI KIỆN CỦA NGUYÊN ĐƠN / TIME LIMIT FOR A DEFENDANT TO SUBMIT A WRITTEN STATEMENT OF OPINION ON THE PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS
- NGƯỜI LAO ĐỘNG ỦY QUYỀN CHO CÁ NHÂN KHÁC NHẬN LƯƠNG THÌ CÓ CẦN CÔNG CHỨNG, CHỨNG THỰC VĂN BẢN ỦY QUYỀN KHÔNG? / IS NOTARIZATION OR CERTIFICATION REQUIRED WHEN AN EMPLOYEE AUTHORIZES ANOTHER PERSON TO RECEIVE SALARY ON HIS/HER BEHALF?
- TỔNG HỢP 12 MẪU HỢP ĐỒNG HỢP TÁC CỦA MỘT SỐ QUỐC GIA TRÊN THẾ GIỚI / COLLECTION OF 12 COOPERATION AGREEMENTS FROM VARIOUS COUNTRIES AROUND THE WORLD
- TỔNG HỢP MỘT SỐ BÀI BÁO PHÁP LÝ QUỐC TẾ VỀ BẢO VỆ DỮ LIỆU / COLLECTION INTERNATIONAL ARTICLES ON DATA PROTECTION
- PHÂN BIỆT GIÁM HỘ & ĐẠI DIỆN TRONG DÂN SỰ / DISTINCTION BETWEEN GUARDIANSHIP & CIVIL REPRESENTATION
- ĐIỀU KIỆN, HỒ SƠ VÀ TRÌNH TỰ CÔNG NHẬN, CHO THI HÀNH BẢN ÁN LY HÔN CỦA TÒA ÁN NƯỚC NGOÀI TẠI VIỆT NAM
- TRÁCH NHIỆM KHI KHÔNG CHẤP HÀNH QUYẾT ĐỊNH THI HÀNH ÁN / LIABILITIES UPON FAILURE OF COMPLIANCE WITH ENFORCEMENT DECISION
- KHÔNG NHƯỜNG ĐƯỜNG CHO XE RẼ PHẢI CÓ BỊ PHẠT KHÔNG? / IS FAILURE TO YIELD TO VEHICLES TURNING RIGHT FINED?



