Our company registered a trademark, we applied on 10/10/2017 but until now our trademark has not been granted a protection title. When searching for trademarks, I figure out the enterprise has the same business lines as me with the same brand, Although it is not identical but it may be confusingly similar, In this case, Can I prevent NOIP from granting protection titles to both? In this case, what can I do to ensure my benefits? sincerely!
FDVN’s opinion:
Thank you for concerning FDVN’s legal services. Regarding your consulting requests, after studying the relevant legal documents, FDVN Law Firm would like to give you the following advice:
In Article 112 of the 2005 Law on Intellectual Property, amending and supplementing 2009 stipulates:
“From the date an application for registration of industrial property is published in the Official Gazette of Industrial Property up until prior to the date of issuance of a decision on grant of a protection title, any third party shall have the right to express an opinion to the competent State administrative body for industrial property rights on the grant or refusal to grant a protection title for such application. Such opinions must be made in writing and be accompanied by documents or must quote the source of information.”
Opponents of granting protection titles must pay a fee of 550,000 VND for handling of disapproval of applications related to the industrial property (Circular No. 263/2016 / TT-BTC). Third-party written opinions are considered as a source of information for the industrial property registration process
After receiving the written opinion and information verification documents, the processing of the third party’s opinions before the issuance of the decision on the grant of protection certificates in accordance with Clause 6 Article 1 of Circular 16 /. 2016 / TT-BKHCN as follows:
+ From the date on which the application for registration of industrial property is published in the Industrial Property Official Gazette to the date prior to the issuance of a decision on the grant of a protection certificate, any organization or individual may send the NOIP their written opinions on the registration right, priority right, protection conditions and other issues concerning the application for registration of industrial property as prescribed in Article 112 of the Law on Intellectual Property. The person having a dissenting opinion against the issuance of the protection certificate must pay fees for processing of the dissenting opinion. The written opinion of the third party shall be treated as an information source serving the processing of the application for registration of industrial property.
+ If considering the opinion of the third party grounded, the NOIP shall notify the applicant of such opinion and set a time limit of 01 month from the date of notification in order for the applicant to send a written response. After receiving the written response sent by the applicant, when necessary, the NOIP shall send such a written response to the third party and set a time limit of 01 month from the date of notification in order for the third party to send a written response. After the abovementioned time limit, the NOIP shall process the opinion of the applicant and the third party according to the evidence and arguments provided by the parties and documents included in the application. The third-party shall be also informed of the results of the substantive examination of the corresponding application.
+ If considering the opinions of the third party groundless, the NOIP is not required to notify the applicant of those opinions but shall notify the third party of its refusal to consider the opinions, clearly stating the reason thereof.
+ If opinions of the third party are related to the registration right, when finding it impossible to determine whether such opinions are grounded or not, the NOIP shall notify the third party so that the latter can file a lawsuit to a competent court in accordance with regulations of the Civil Procedure Code. Within 01 month from the date on which the NOIP issues the notice, if the third party fails to send the NOIP the copy of the notice of case acceptance of the court, it will be considered that the third party has dropped the lawsuit and continue to process the application without the third party’s opinions. If the NOIP receives such a copy within the abovementioned time limit, the NOIP shall suspend the application processing until the results of the dispute settlement by the court are obtained. After the results of the dispute settlement by the court are obtained, the application processing shall be resumed in accordance with those results.
+ When necessary and at the request of both parties, the NOIP shall organize a face-to-face meeting between the third party and the applicant to further clarify the dissenting opinion.
+ The time limit for response to the third party’s dissenting opinions by the applicant shall not be added to the time limit for completion of relevant procedures by the NOIP to according to regulations.”.
So, according to the above provisions, your partner can make a written opinion with The State administrative body for industrial property rights to grant or not to grant a protection title for this application. Within the time limit of the Law, the NOIP will carry out relevant procedures to deal with the request of the Partner in accordance with the law.
Above is FDVN Law Firm's opinion for your consulting requests based on studying the relevant legal provisions. Hopefully, FDVN's advice would be helpful to you.
FDVN Law Firm
CONTACT US
Lawyers in Da Nang:
99 Nguyen Huu Tho, Quan Hai Chau, Da Nang city
Lawyers in Hue:
336 Phan Chu Trinh, Hue City, Thua Thien Hue
Lawyers in Phu Quoc:
65 Hung Vuong, Duong Dong town, Phu Quoc island district
Lawyers in Quang Ngai:
359 Nguyen Du, Quang Ngai City, Quang Ngai Province.
Lawyers in Ha Noi
45C Tran Quoc Toan, Tran Hung Dạo, Hoang Kiem, Ha Noi
Website: www.fdvn.vn www.fdvnlawfirm.vn www.diendanngheluat.vn www.tuvanphapluatdanang.com
Email: fdvnlawfirm@gmail.com luatsulecao@gmail.com
Phone: 0935 643 666 – 0906 499 446
Fanpage LUẬT SƯ FDVN: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirm/
Legal Service For Expat: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirmvietnam/
TỦ SÁCH NGHỀ LUẬT: https://www.facebook.com/SayMeNgheLuat/
DIỄN ĐÀN NGHỀ LUẬT: https://www.facebook.com/groups/saymengheluat/
Other Articles
- THỦ TỤC CẤP ĐỔI, CẤP LẠI THẺ THƯỜNG TRÚ CHO NGƯỜI NƯỚC NGOÀI TẠI VIỆT NAM / PROCEDURES FOR REPLACEMENT, REISSUANCE OF PERMANENT RESIDENCE CARDS FROM JULY 1, 2026
- LAW SCHOOL FOR EVERYONE BY PROFESSOR EDWARD K.CHENG, JOSEPH L. HOFFMANN, MOLLY BISHOP SHADEL AND PETER SMITH
- HƯỚNG DẪN CÁCH TÍNH ƯU ĐÃI THUẾ THU NHẬP CÁ NHÂN ĐỐI VỚI CHUYÊN GIA, NHÀ KHOA HỌC LÀM VIỆC TRONG LĨNH VỰC KHỞI NGHIỆP SÁNG TẠO / GUIDANCE ON CALCULATING PERSONAL INCOME TAX INCENTIVES FOR EXPERTS AND SCIENTISTS WORKING IN THE FIELD OF INNOVATIVE STARTUPS
- LAW SCHOOL FOR EVERYONE LEGISLATION AND REGULATION BY PROFESSOR PETER J.SMITH
- SINH CON THỨ HAI TỪ NGÀY 01/7/2026: THỜI GIAN NGHỈ VÀ CÁCH TÍNH TIỀN THAI SẢN / SECOND CHILDBIRTH FROM JULY 1, 2026: MATERNITY LEAVE PERIOD AND CALCULATION OF MATERNITY BENEFITS
- LAW SCHOOL FOR EVERYONE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW BY PROFESSOR ERIC BERGER
- TỔNG HỢP TỪ VỰNG VÀ THUẬT NGỮ PHÁP LÝ TIẾNG ANH THÔNG DỤNG DÀNH CHO HÔN NHÂN GIA ĐÌNH
- LAW SCHOOL FOR EVERYONE CONTRACTS BY PROFESSOR DAVID HORTON
- LAW SCHOOL FOR EVERYONE CORPORATE LAW BY PROFESSOR GEORGE S. GEIS
- TỔNG HỢP 08 BẢN ÁN CỦA TOÀ ÁN VƯƠNG QUỐC ANH VỀ TRANH CHẤP LIÊN QUAN ĐẾN DỮ LIỆU CÁ NHÂN / COLLECTION OF 08 UK COURT JUDGMENTS ON DISPUTES RELATING TO PERSONAL DATA
- TỔNG HỢP 12 BẢN ÁN CỦA TOÀ ÁN SINGAPORE VỀ TRANH CHẤP CÔNG NGHỆ VÀ SỞ HỮU TRÍ TUỆ / 12 SINGAPORE COURTS JUDGMENTS ON TECHNOLOGY AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DISPUTES
- TỔNG HỢP MỘT SỐ MẪU ĐƠN KHỞI KIỆN DÂN SỰ TRÊN THẾ GIỚI / COLLECTION OF CIVIL STATEMENT OF CLAIM TEMLATES FROM OVER THE WORLD
- BỘ TÀI LIỆU HƯỚNG DẪN THỦ TỤC HÀNH CHÍNH VỀ ĐĂNG KÝ QUYỀN TÁC GIẢ, QUYỀN LIÊN QUAN CỦA CỤC CÔNG NGHIỆP VĂN HOÁ VÀ BẢN QUYỀN TÁC GIẢ - BỘ VĂN HOÁ, THỂ THAO VÀ DU LỊCH
- THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PLAYBOOK: POWERS, RESPONSIBILITES AND INTERACTIONS BETWEEN SHAREHOLDERS, BOARD AND MANAGEMENT BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC
- ĐÀ NẴNG: DOANH NGHIỆP CẦN HOÀN THÀNH KÊ KHAI THÔNG TIN CHỦ SỞ HỮU HƯỞNG LỢI TRƯỚC NGÀY 30/11/2026 THEO CÔNG VĂN 14848/STC-DN&ĐKKD
- BÀI HỌC TIẾNG ANH PHÁP LÝ: APPEAL



