Since I haven’t I have no need to use a car and want to earn more money, I let my car leased by Mr. Nam. Recently, I found out that Mr. Nam let some one lease my car while there was no sub-lease agreement between us. I would like to ask if I am entitled to terminate the lease agreement signed with Mr. Nam.
FDVN’s Opinions:
The lease agreement between you and Mr. Nam fell into Section 5 - contracts for lease of property - of Chapter XVI of Civil Code 2015. Then, the rights and liabilities of the involved parties and the terimination of the lease contract are stipulated as follows:
According to Article 475 of Civil Code 2015 on sub-leasing: “A lessee may sub-lease leased property with the consent of the lessor.”
According to the information provided, you let Mr. Nam lease the car and did not agree that he could let somebody sub-lease your car. Therefore, that Mr. Nam subleased the car without your consent is an act of improper use of the leased property.
It is stipulated in Article 480 of Civil Code 2015 that: “1. A lessee must use leased property strictly in accordance with its utility and the agreed purpose. 2.Where a lessee fails to use leased property strictly in accordance with its utility and purpose, the lessor has the right to terminate unilaterally the performance of the contract and to demand compensation for damage.”
Because there was no agreement on the unilateral termination of the contract, Clause 2 of Article 428 of Civil Code 2015 is applied in this case: “A party terminating unilaterally the performance of a contract must notify the other party immediately of its termination of the contract and must compensate if the failure to notify causes damage.”
Therefore, to terminate the contract signed with Mr. Nam, you shall send him a notice on the termination. At that time, you may apply Clause 3 of Article 428 of Civil Code 2015: “Where the performance of a contract is terminated unilaterally, it shall terminate from the time when the other party is notified of the termination. In such case, the parties are not required to continue to perform their obligations, except for agreement on fines for violations, compensation for damage and settlement of disputes. A party which has already performed its obligation may demand the other party to make payment for the performed obligation.”
Hoàng Trần Ngọc Anh – FDVN Law Firm
CONTACT US:
Lawyers in Da Nang:
99 Nguyen Huu Tho, Quan Hai Chau, Da Nang city
Lawyers in Hue:
56A Dien Bien Phu, Hue City, Thua Thien Hue
336 Phan Chu Trinh, Hue City, Thua Thien Hue
Lawyers in Phu Quoc:
65 Hung Vuong, Duong Dong town, Phu Quoc island district
Lawyers in Quang Ngai:
359 Nguyen Du, Quang Ngai City, Quang Ngai Province.
Lawyers in Ha Noi
Room 501, 5th Floor, No. 11, Lane No. 183, Dang Tien Dong Street, Dong Da District, Ha Noi
Lawyers in Nghe An
No. 19 V.I Lenin street, Vinh City, Nghe An Province
Website: www.fdvn.vn www.fdvnlawfirm.vn www.diendanngheluat.vn www.tuvanphapluatdanang.com
Email: fdvnlawfirm@gmail.com luatsulecao@gmail.com
Phone: 0935 643 666 – 0906 499 446
Fanpage LUẬT SƯ FDVN: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirm/
Legal Service For Expat: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirmvietnam/
TỦ SÁCH NGHỀ LUẬT: https://www.facebook.com/SayMeNgheLuat/
DIỄN ĐÀN NGHỀ LUẬT: https://www.facebook.com/groups/saymengheluat/
Other Articles
- TỔNG HỢP 08 BẢN ÁN CỦA CÁC TOÀ ÁN VƯƠNG QUỐC ANH VỀ TRANH CHẤP GIỮA CÁC CỔ ĐÔNG CÔNG TY / COLLECTION OF 08 JUDGMENTS OF THE COURTS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM CORCERNING BETWEEN SHAREHOLDERS
- BÀI HỌC TIẾNG ANH PHÁP LÝ: IMPACT
- TỔNG HỢP 90 ÁN LỆ SONG NGỮ VIỆT - ANH / COLLECTION OF 90 BILINGUAL CASE LAWS
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 83/2026/AL VỀ TRÁCH NHIỆM BỒI THƯỜNG CỦA DOANH NGHIỆP BẢO HIỂM KHI CƠ QUAN CÓ THẨM QUYỀN CHƯA XÁC ĐỊNH ĐƯỢC NGƯỜI GÂY RA THIỆT HẠI VỀ TÀI SẢN / CASE LAW NO. 83/2026/AL ON THE INDEMNIFICATION LIABILITY OF AN INSURANCE ENTERPRISE WHERE THE COMPETEN
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 84/2026/AL VỀ CHẤM DỨT VIỆC NUÔI CON NUÔI LÀ NGƯỜI CHƯA THÀNH NIÊN KHI NGƯỜI NHẬN CON NUÔI LÀ NGƯỜI ĐỘC THÂN CHẾT / CASE LAW NO. 84/2026/AL ON TERMINATION OF THE ADOPTIVE RELATIONSHIP WITH A MINOR ADOPTEE WHERE THE SINGLE ADOPTIVE PARENT DIES
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 85/2026/AL VỀ VIỆC THAM GIA TỐ TỤNG CỦA DOANH NGHIỆP BẢO HIỂM THÀNH VIÊN THEO HỢP ĐỒNG NGUYÊN TẮC ĐỒNG BẢO HIỂM / CASE LAW NO. 85/2026/AL ON THE PARTICIPATION IN PROCEEDINGS OF MEMBER INSURANCE ENTERPRISES UNDER A CO-INSURANCE FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 86/2026/AL VỀ SỰ KIỆN PHÁP LÝ LÀM PHÁT SINH CĂN CỨ ĐỂ XEM XÉT KHÁNG NGHỊ THEO THỦ TỤC TÁI THẨM / CASE LAW NO. 86/2026/AL ON A LEGAL EVENT GIVING RISE TO GROUNDS FOR CONSIDERATION OF A PROTEST UNDER REOPENING PROCEDURES
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 87/2026/AL VỀ THỨ TỰ ƯU TIÊN THANH TOÁN KHI XỬ LÝ TÀI SẢN BẢO ĐẢM / CASE LAW NO. 87/2026/AL ON PRIORITY OF PAYMENT UPON ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY ASSETS
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 88/2026/AL VỀ ỦY QUYỀN THAM GIA TỐ TỤNG TRONG VỤ ÁN TRANH CHẤP VỀ NUÔI CON / CASE LAW NO. 88/2026/AL ON AUTHORIZATION TO PARTICIPATE IN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS IN A CHILD CUSTODY DISPUTE CASE
- BÀI HỌC TIẾNG ANH PHÁP LÝ: CẤU TRÚC UNLESS
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 89/2026/AL VỀ VIỆC BỒI THƯỜNG, HỖ TRỢ KHI NHÀ NƯỚC THU HỒI ĐẤT ĐỐI VỚI TÀI SẢN LÀ NHÀ MUA THANH LÝ ĐỂ Ở TRÊN ĐẤT CỦA CƠ QUAN NHÀ NƯỚC / CASE LAW NO. 89/2026/AL ON COMPENSATION AND SUPPORT UPON STATE RECOVERY OF LAND FOR HOUSES PURCHASED THROUGH L
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 90/2026/AL VỀ THẨM QUYỀN HỦY GIẤY CHỨNG NHẬN QUYỀN SỬ DỤNG ĐẤT CỦA TÒA ÁN / CASE LAW NO. 90/2026/AL RE: ON THE COURT’S AUTHORITY TO REVOKE A LAND USE RIGHTS CERTIFICATE
- TỔNG LƯỢC 08 ÁN LỆ MỚI NHẤT CÓ HIỆU LỰC TỪ NGÀY 01/7/2026 / OVERVIEW OF 8 NEW CASE LAWS EFFECTIVE FROM JULY 1, 2026
- LEARNING LEGAL ENGLISH WITH FDVN LAW FIRM: WHILST AND WHILE
- THỜI HẠN GIAO NỘP TÀI LIỆU, CHỨNG CỨ TRONG VỤ ÁN DÂN SỰ / TIME LIMIT FOR SUBMISSION OF DOCUMENTS AND EVIDENCE IN CIVIL CASES
- THỜI ĐIỂM NỘP VĂN BẢN TRÌNH BÀY Ý KIẾN CỦA BỊ ĐƠN VỀ NỘI DUNG KHỞI KIỆN CỦA NGUYÊN ĐƠN / TIME LIMIT FOR A DEFENDANT TO SUBMIT A WRITTEN STATEMENT OF OPINION ON THE PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS



