In 12/2018, I and Mr. Nguyen Van T mutually signed a contract of purchasing housing which was not certified. At that time, I paid 1 billion VND to him with a receipt. We mutually agreed that by 1/2019, Mr. T has had to complete the conveyancing procedure and I have had to give him the remaining 500 million VND (total value of the contract is 1.5 billion VND). My family moved to the house at the time the contract was signed.
However, Mr. T didn’t carry out the conveyancing despite the expiry of the procedure. He said that he did not want to sell anymore. So, is it legal that he wants to return the sum of money I have given to him and take back the house?
FDVN’s opinion:
Sincerely thank you for your concerning our legal consulting service. We are glad to give you our advice for your question.
Firstly, about the legal provisions on contracts for the transfer of land use rights and house ownership:
According to Clause 3 Article 167 Land Law: “a) Contracts on transfer, donation, mortgage or contribution of land use rights as capital or the rights to use land and land-attached assets must be notarized or certified, except the case of real estate business prescribed at Point b of this Clause”;
According to Clause 1,2 Article 122 Law on Housing:
“1. Regarding agreements on housing sale, giving, exchange, capital contribution, mortgage, or transfer of agreement on commercial housing sale, it is required to notarize or authenticate the agreement, except for cases prescribed in Clause 2 of this Article.
Regarding any agreement prescribed in this Clause, the effective date of the agreement shall be the date on which the agreement is notarized or authenticated.
2. Regarding transactions giving houses of gratitude; sale or lease-purchase of state-owned housing; sale or lease-purchase of social housing, housing serving the relocation; contributed housing which one entity of contracting parties is an organization; housing lease, lending, permission for stay, or authorization of housing management, it is not required to notarize or authenticate the agreement, unless contracting parties wish to notarize or authenticate the agreement.”
So, contracts on transfer land use right, housing ownership has to be certified according to applicable law provisions.
Therefore, contracts on transfer land use right, housing ownership between you and Mr. T which was not certified violated the conditions for effectiveness of civil transactions according to Clause 2 Article 117 Civil Code 2015 “The forms of civil transactions shall be the conditions for its effectiveness in cases where it is so provided for by law.”
Secondly, law provisions on resolving civil contracts violate formal conditions:
According to Clause 2 Article 129 Civil Code regulating about the invalid civil transaction:
“A civil transaction violating conditions for validity pertaining to form shall be invalid, except for any of the following cases:
2. If the form of a civil transaction, required to be established in writing, violates against regulations on notarizing or authorization, but a party or the parties has/have to fulfill at least two-third of the obligations in the transaction, a court, at his/her/their request(s), shall issue a decision on recognition of the validity of such transaction. In this case, the parties need not perform the notarizing or authorization.”
As you mentioned above, at the time the contract was signed, you paid 1 billion VND to Mr. T, which was calculated 2/3 of the total contract value. Besides, you have used the house until now. Although the contract between you and Mr. T was not certified under the relevant law provisions, you both performed 2/3 of the contractual obligations. Therefore, in your case, the contract of purchasing housing signed in December 2018 is recognized valid. Thus, it’s illegal that Mr. T take back the house he sold.
Above are the advice of FDVN Limited Law Firm base on studying law provisions and theories. We hope that our opinions would be useful.
Legal Expert: Duong Hoai Thuong
FDVN Law Company
CONTACT US
Lawyers in Da Nang:
99 Nguyen Huu Tho, Quan Hai Chau, Da Nang city
Lawyers in Hue:
336 Phan Chu Trinh, Hue City, Thua Thien Hue
Lawyers in Phu Quoc:
65 Hung Vuong, Duong Dong town, Phu Quoc island district
Lawyers in Quang Ngai:
359 Nguyen Du, Quang Ngai City, Quang Ngai Province.
Website: www.fdvn.vn www.tuvanphapluatdanang.com
Email: fdvnlawfirm@gmail.com luatsulecao@gmail.com
Phone: 0935 643 666 - 0906 499 446
Fanpage: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirm/
Other Articles
- THÔNG TƯ SỐ 38/2026/TT-BTC CỦA BỘ TÀI CHÍNH: QUY ĐỊNH MẪU VĂN BẢN, BÁO CÁO VỀ ĐẦU TƯ RA NƯỚC NGOÀI CÓ HIỆU LỰC TỪ NGÀY 15/04/2026
- CẤU TRÚC IN CASE
- HỢP ĐỒNG CHUYỂN NHƯỢNG QUYỀN SỬ DỤNG ĐẤT VÔ HIỆU DO NHẦM LẪN, GIẢ TẠO TRONG GIAO DỊCH DÂN SỰ: TỒN TẠI VÀ KIẾN NGHỊ HOÀN THIỆN
- CÓ THỂ SỬ DỤNG BITCOIN LÀM PHƯƠNG TIỆN THANH TOÁN TẠI VIỆT NAM HAY KHÔNG? / CAN BITCOIN BE USED AS A MEANS OF PAYMENT IN VIETNAM?
- INFOGRAPHIC 08 TRƯỜNG HỢP ĐƯỢC TẠM HOÃN GỌI NHẬP NGŨ / INFOGRAPHIC 08 CASES POSTPONEMENT FROM CONSCRIPTION
- BÀI HỌC TIẾNG ANH PHÁP LÝ: ARRANGE
- NGHỊ QUYẾT 15/2026/NQ-CP VỀ VIỆC TẠM NGƯNG HIỆU LỰC NGHỊ ĐỊNH SỐ 46/2026/NĐ-CP NGÀY 26/01/2026 VÀ NGHỊ QUYẾT SỐ 66.13/2026/NQ-CP NGÀY 27/01/2026 CỦA CHÍNH PHỦ
- NGHỊ ĐỊNH 103/2026/NĐ-CP QUY ĐỊNH VỀ ĐẦU TƯ RA NƯỚC NGOÀI CÓ HIỆU LỰC TỪ NGÀY 03/04/2026
- PHÂN BIỆT GET SOMETHING DONE VÀ HAVE SOMETHING DONE
- TRƯNG CẦU GIÁM ĐỊNH BỔ SUNG TRONG TỐ TỤNG HÌNH SỰ VIỆT NAM / SUPPLEMENTARY EXPERT EXAMINATION IN VIETNAMESE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
- BRING ĐI VỚI GIỚI TỪ GÌ?
- CẤU TRÚC IT IS NO USE
- THE ISSUE OF JUDGMENT DEBTORS WITHOUT CONDITIONS FOR ENFORCEMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LEGAL IMPROVEMENT / VẤN ĐỀ NGƯỜI PHẢI THI HÀNH ÁN KHÔNG ĐỦ ĐIỀU KIỆN THI HÀNH ÁN VÀ KIẾN NGHỊ HOÀN THIỆN PHÁP LUẬT
- MỘT SỐ VẤN ĐỀ PHÁP LÝ VỀ TÀI SẢN KHI NAM, NỮ SỐNG CHUNG NHƯ VỢ CHỒNG MÀ KHÔNG ĐĂNG KÝ KẾT HÔN / LEGAL ISSUES CONCERNING PROPERTY WHEN A MAN AND A WOMAN COHABIT AS HUSBAND AND WIFE WITHOUT MARRIAGE REGISTRATION
- YÊU CẦU THI HÀNH ÁN ĐỐI VỚI VỤ ÁN HÀNH CHÍNH Ở ĐÂU? / WHERE ARE A REQUEST FOR ENFORCEMENT OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGMENT FILED?
- DỪNG ĐÈN ĐỎ CÓ DÙNG ĐIỆN THOẠI ĐƯỢC KHÔNG? / IS USING A MOBILE PHONE WHILE STOPPING AT A RED LIGHT PERMITTED?



