Currently, there are many disputes in the field of marriage and family, including disputes over common property. Many difficult and long-term disputes related to property formed during marriage but there is a name of a partner on the certificate of ownership. Is it necessary to have the evidence on the ownership or based on the name in the certificate?
It is stipulated in Article 33 of the Law on Marriage and Family 2014 on the Common property of husband and wife:
"1. The common property of husband and wife includes property created by a spouse, incomes generated from labor, production and business activities, yields and profits arising from separate property and other lawful incomes in the marriage period; except the case prescribed in Clause 1, Article 40 of this Law; property jointly inherited by or given to both, and other property agreed upon by husband and wife as common property.
The land-use rights obtained by a spouse after marriage shall be the common property of husband and wife, unless they are separately inherited by, or given to a spouse or are obtained through transactions made with separate property.
2. The common property of husband and wife shall be under integrated common ownership and used to meet family needs and perform common obligations of husband and wife.
3. When exists no ground to prove that a property in dispute between husband and wife is his/her separate property, such property shall be regarded as common property."
It is stipulated in Article 43 of the Law on Marriage and Family 2014 on the separate property of husband and wife:
"1. Separate property of a spouse includes property owned by this person before marriage; property inherited by or given separately to him/her during the marriage period; property divided to him/her under Articles 38,39 and 40 of this Law; property to meet his/her essential needs and other property under his/her ownership as prescribed by law.
2. Property created from separate property of a husband or wife is also property of his/ her own. Yields and profits arising from separate property during the marriage period must comply with Clause 1, Article 33, and Clause 1, Article 40, of this Law."
Moreover, it is stipulated at Point b, Section 3 of Resolution No. 02/2000/NQ-HDTP dated December 23, 2000 of the Council of Judges of the Supreme People's Court guiding the application of a number of provisions of the Law on Marriage and Family Year 2000:
"In order to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties, in cases where the property acquired by a spouse during a marriage is required to be registered for ownership and there is only a spouse's name in that certificate. If there is no dispute, it is the common property of the spouse. If there is a dispute over that property, the person named in the ownership certificate must prove that this property is inherited separately, given separately during the marriage or this property is derived from the property source according to Clause 1, Article 32 (for example: inheriting a sum of money separately and using this money to buy himself a motorbike but he does not add it into the common property of the spouses). In cases where this disputed property cannot be proved to be private property, according to Clause 3, Article 27, such property is the common property of husband and wife."
Thus, referring to the combination of the above, it is understood that:
- If there is no dispute over that property: It is the common property.
- If there is a dispute over that property: The person whose name is in the certificate must prove the source of that property such as being inherited separately, given separately or getting it from a separate property. If this disputed property cannot be proved that it is the separate property, it will be considered common property.
Thus, in the marriage period, a property is not considered a separate property even though it is registered under a spouse name. To avoid disputes over the property, husband and wife should negotiate clearly about the property under Article 28 of the Law on Marriage and Family 2014.
Hoang Thuy Quynh
FDVN Law Firm.
CONTACT US
Lawyers in Da Nang:
99 Nguyen Huu Tho, Quan Hai Chau, Da Nang city
Lawyers in Hue:
336 Phan Chu Trinh, Hue City, Thua Thien Hue
Lawyers in Phu Quoc:
65 Hung Vuong, Duong Dong town, Phu Quoc island district
Lawyers in Quang Ngai:
359 Nguyen Du, Quang Ngai City, Quang Ngai Province.
Website: www.fdvn.vn www.tuvanphapluatdanang.com
Email: fdvnlawfirm@gmail.com luatsulecao@gmail.com
Phone: 0935 643 666 - 0906 499 446
Fanpage: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirm/
Other Articles
- BÀI HỌC TIẾNG ANH PHÁP LÝ: ACCORDING TO
- LAWYERS, LIARS, AND THE ART OF STORYTELLING BY JONATHAN SHAPIRO
- NGHỊ ĐỊNH SỐ 385/2026/NĐ-CP CỦA CHÍNH PHỦ VỀ KIỂM SOÁT THỦ TỤC HÀNH CHÍNH
- VENTURE CAPITAL MODEL AGREEMENT WITH COMMENTARY: A CLAUSE-BY-CLAUSE GUIDE FOR LAWYERS IN ANY JURISDICTION BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC
- NGHỊ ĐỊNH 371/2026/NĐ-CP QUY ĐỊNH CHI TIẾT VIỆC TUYỂN DỤNG, QUẢN LÝ NGƯỜI LAO ĐỘNG VIỆT NAM LÀM VIỆC CHO CÁC TỔ CHỨC, CÁ NHÂN NƯỚC NGOÀI TẠI VIỆT NAM
- THỦ TỤC XIN CẤP LÝ LỊCH TƯ PHÁP CHO NGƯỜI NƯỚC NGOÀI 2026 / PROCEDURES FOR OBTAINING CRIMINAL RECORDS FOR FOREIGNERS IN 2026
- THỦ TỤC HƯỞNG BẢO HIỂM XÃ HỘI MỘT LẦN CHO NGƯỜI NƯỚC NGOÀI 2026 / PROCEDURES FOR LUMP-SUM SOCIAL INSURANCE ALLOWANCE FOR FOREIGNERS IN 2026
- THE HAPPY LAWYER: MAKING A GOOD LIFE IN THE LAW BY NANCY LEVIT & DOUGLAS O.LINDER
- VIETNAM INVESTMENT PROMOTION GUIDEBOOK 2026 BY VIETNAM TRADE PROMOTION AGENCY - MINISTRY OF INDUSTRY AND TRADE
- THE COMMERCIAL LAWYER'S MIND: UNDERSTANDING BUSINESS WITHOUT BECOMING A BANKER (A PRACTICAL GUIDE FOR LAW STUDENTS AND JUNIOR COMMERCIAL LAWYERS) BY BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC
- QUY ĐỊNH VỀ KHOẢN VAY NƯỚC NGOÀI, HỒ SƠ, THỦ TỤC ĐĂNG KÝ KHOẢN VAY NƯỚC NGOÀI VỚI NGÂN HÀNG NHÀ NƯỚC / REGULATIONS ON FOREIGN LOANS, DOSSIER AND PROCEDURES FOR REGISTRATION OF FOREIGN LOANS WITH THE STATE BANK
- BÀI HỌC TIẾNG ANH PHÁP LÝ: IN VIEW OF
- TỔNG HỢP 10 BẢN ÁN CỦA TOÀ ÁN VƯƠNG QUỐC ANH GIẢI QUYẾT TRANH CHẤP QUYỀN SỞ HỮU TRÍ TUỆ ĐỐI VỚI PHẦN MỀM / COLLECTION 10 UNITED KINGDOM COURT JUDMENTS ON SOFTWARE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DISPUTES
- TỔNG HỢP 12 BẢN ÁN CỦA TÒA ÁN SINGAPORE VỀ AI, BLOCKCHAIN, TIỀN ĐIỆN TỬ VÀ TÀI SẢN SỐ / COLLECTION 12 SINGAPORE COURT JUDGMENTS ON AI, BLOCKCHAIN, CRYPTOCURRENCY AND DIGITAL ASSETS
- TỔNG HỢP CÁC MẪU HỢP ĐỒNG THỬ VIỆC VÀ HỢP ĐỒNG CÓ ĐIỀU KHOẢN THỬ VIỆC TRÊN THẾ GIỚI / COLLECTION OF PROBATIONARY EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT TEMPLATES AND EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT TEMPLATES CONTAINING PROBATIONARY CLAUSES AROUND THE WORLD
- WINNING THE TRIBUNAL (ADVOCACY, STRATEGY, AND PERSUASION BEFORE THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL) BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC



