Currently, there are many disputes in the field of marriage and family, including disputes over common property. Many difficult and long-term disputes related to property formed during marriage but there is a name of a partner on the certificate of ownership. Is it necessary to have the evidence on the ownership or based on the name in the certificate?
It is stipulated in Article 33 of the Law on Marriage and Family 2014 on the Common property of husband and wife:
"1. The common property of husband and wife includes property created by a spouse, incomes generated from labor, production and business activities, yields and profits arising from separate property and other lawful incomes in the marriage period; except the case prescribed in Clause 1, Article 40 of this Law; property jointly inherited by or given to both, and other property agreed upon by husband and wife as common property.
The land-use rights obtained by a spouse after marriage shall be the common property of husband and wife, unless they are separately inherited by, or given to a spouse or are obtained through transactions made with separate property.
2. The common property of husband and wife shall be under integrated common ownership and used to meet family needs and perform common obligations of husband and wife.
3. When exists no ground to prove that a property in dispute between husband and wife is his/her separate property, such property shall be regarded as common property."
It is stipulated in Article 43 of the Law on Marriage and Family 2014 on the separate property of husband and wife:
"1. Separate property of a spouse includes property owned by this person before marriage; property inherited by or given separately to him/her during the marriage period; property divided to him/her under Articles 38,39 and 40 of this Law; property to meet his/her essential needs and other property under his/her ownership as prescribed by law.
2. Property created from separate property of a husband or wife is also property of his/ her own. Yields and profits arising from separate property during the marriage period must comply with Clause 1, Article 33, and Clause 1, Article 40, of this Law."
Moreover, it is stipulated at Point b, Section 3 of Resolution No. 02/2000/NQ-HDTP dated December 23, 2000 of the Council of Judges of the Supreme People's Court guiding the application of a number of provisions of the Law on Marriage and Family Year 2000:
"In order to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties, in cases where the property acquired by a spouse during a marriage is required to be registered for ownership and there is only a spouse's name in that certificate. If there is no dispute, it is the common property of the spouse. If there is a dispute over that property, the person named in the ownership certificate must prove that this property is inherited separately, given separately during the marriage or this property is derived from the property source according to Clause 1, Article 32 (for example: inheriting a sum of money separately and using this money to buy himself a motorbike but he does not add it into the common property of the spouses). In cases where this disputed property cannot be proved to be private property, according to Clause 3, Article 27, such property is the common property of husband and wife."
Thus, referring to the combination of the above, it is understood that:
- If there is no dispute over that property: It is the common property.
- If there is a dispute over that property: The person whose name is in the certificate must prove the source of that property such as being inherited separately, given separately or getting it from a separate property. If this disputed property cannot be proved that it is the separate property, it will be considered common property.
Thus, in the marriage period, a property is not considered a separate property even though it is registered under a spouse name. To avoid disputes over the property, husband and wife should negotiate clearly about the property under Article 28 of the Law on Marriage and Family 2014.
Hoang Thuy Quynh
FDVN Law Firm.
CONTACT US
Lawyers in Da Nang:
99 Nguyen Huu Tho, Quan Hai Chau, Da Nang city
Lawyers in Hue:
336 Phan Chu Trinh, Hue City, Thua Thien Hue
Lawyers in Phu Quoc:
65 Hung Vuong, Duong Dong town, Phu Quoc island district
Lawyers in Quang Ngai:
359 Nguyen Du, Quang Ngai City, Quang Ngai Province.
Website: www.fdvn.vn www.tuvanphapluatdanang.com
Email: fdvnlawfirm@gmail.com luatsulecao@gmail.com
Phone: 0935 643 666 - 0906 499 446
Fanpage: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirm/
Other Articles
- HƯỚNG DẪN CÁCH TÍNH ƯU ĐÃI THUẾ THU NHẬP CÁ NHÂN ĐỐI VỚI CHUYÊN GIA, NHÀ KHOA HỌC LÀM VIỆC TRONG LĨNH VỰC KHỞI NGHIỆP SÁNG TẠO / GUIDANCE ON CALCULATING PERSONAL INCOME TAX INCENTIVES FOR EXPERTS AND SCIENTISTS WORKING IN THE FIELD OF INNOVATIVE STARTUPS
- LAW SCHOOL FOR EVERYONE LEGISLATION AND REGULATION BY PROFESSOR PETER J.SMITH
- SINH CON THỨ HAI TỪ NGÀY 01/7/2026: THỜI GIAN NGHỈ VÀ CÁCH TÍNH TIỀN THAI SẢN / SECOND CHILDBIRTH FROM JULY 1, 2026: MATERNITY LEAVE PERIOD AND CALCULATION OF MATERNITY BENEFITS
- LAW SCHOOL FOR EVERYONE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW BY PROFESSOR ERIC BERGER
- TỔNG HỢP TỪ VỰNG VÀ THUẬT NGỮ PHÁP LÝ TIẾNG ANH THÔNG DỤNG DÀNH CHO HÔN NHÂN GIA ĐÌNH
- LAW SCHOOL FOR EVERYONE CONTRACTS BY PROFESSOR DAVID HORTON
- LAW SCHOOL FOR EVERYONE CORPORATE LAW BY PROFESSOR GEORGE S. GEIS
- TỔNG HỢP 08 BẢN ÁN CỦA TOÀ ÁN VƯƠNG QUỐC ANH VỀ TRANH CHẤP LIÊN QUAN ĐẾN DỮ LIỆU CÁ NHÂN / COLLECTION OF 08 UK COURT JUDGMENTS ON DISPUTES RELATING TO PERSONAL DATA
- TỔNG HỢP 12 BẢN ÁN CỦA TOÀ ÁN SINGAPORE VỀ TRANH CHẤP CÔNG NGHỆ VÀ SỞ HỮU TRÍ TUỆ / 12 SINGAPORE COURTS JUDGMENTS ON TECHNOLOGY AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DISPUTES
- TỔNG HỢP MỘT SỐ MẪU ĐƠN KHỞI KIỆN DÂN SỰ TRÊN THẾ GIỚI / COLLECTION OF CIVIL STATEMENT OF CLAIM TEMLATES FROM OVER THE WORLD
- BỘ TÀI LIỆU HƯỚNG DẪN THỦ TỤC HÀNH CHÍNH VỀ ĐĂNG KÝ QUYỀN TÁC GIẢ, QUYỀN LIÊN QUAN CỦA CỤC CÔNG NGHIỆP VĂN HOÁ VÀ BẢN QUYỀN TÁC GIẢ - BỘ VĂN HOÁ, THỂ THAO VÀ DU LỊCH
- THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PLAYBOOK: POWERS, RESPONSIBILITES AND INTERACTIONS BETWEEN SHAREHOLDERS, BOARD AND MANAGEMENT BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC
- ĐÀ NẴNG: DOANH NGHIỆP CẦN HOÀN THÀNH KÊ KHAI THÔNG TIN CHỦ SỞ HỮU HƯỞNG LỢI TRƯỚC NGÀY 30/11/2026 THEO CÔNG VĂN 14848/STC-DN&ĐKKD
- BÀI HỌC TIẾNG ANH PHÁP LÝ: APPEAL
- NGHỊ ĐỊNH 393/2026/NĐ-CP QUY ĐỊNH VỀ NGƯỜI LAO ĐỘNG NƯỚC NGOÀI LÀM VIỆC TẠI VIỆT NAM
- DOING BUSINESS IN VIETNAM: A GUIDE TO THE REASONING, NOT THE RULES SO THAT WHEN THE LAW CHANGES, YOU ALREADY KNOW WHERE TO LOOK BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC



