When injured on the property of another, it is often possible to initiate a claim for reasonable compensation. If the injury is due to snow and/or ice, however, the possibility of compensation may increase or decrease depending on the knowledge or foresight of the property owner. The owner or controller of the property will need to remove the danger within a certain period of time to remain free from liability.
Foreknowledge of the Ice and Snow
When the owner has knowledge or foreknowledge that ice and snow are possible, he or she may act negligently when not clearing up the danger for others that may travel through or in the property. This usually involves guests, invited individuals and others that will have appointments or are guests of adjoining suites in a building. However, many accidents also occur in the parking lot, on stairs or with icy and slick locations that are on the external portion of the property. Any foreknowledge that the ice or snow is a hazard can lead to liability in paying compensation to the injured party.
Time to Clear the Danger
When the owner or controller of the property knows that ice or snow will accumulate with the parking lot, on the stairs or other locations on the property, he or she usually has up to 48 hours to get rid of the hazard before becoming liable for damages. Even if the weather appears suddenly or is something the owner expects, the laws for both state and federal rules will apply this period to ensure the owner has the ability and time to act. After the effective 48 hours, the owner or controller of the location could retain all responsibility for injuries that happen.
Controlling the Accumulation
Accumulation of ice and snow usually requires either a storm to come in or time for the weather to provide the accumulation. The property or landowner usually has up to 48 hours to remove the accumulation to prevent a lawsuit. However, if the weather increases the amount or the owner does nothing to stop the accumulation, it is possible that anyone that suffers an injury on the property has the ability and right to sue the company or owner. Any measures to remove the snow or ice are reasonable and may go against the possible compensation or ability to recover with the plaintiff.
Foreknowledge of the Snow or Ice
Generally, the owner of the property or the controlling party will have some knowledge that ice or snow is likely or that it will occur on the property. The weather pattern, news or current storm may give an indication that now or ice is imminent or may become a problem. This foreknowledge usually works against the property owner or controller in a premise liability case when the ice or now harms a person on the property. The more right the individual has with proximity to the vicinity, the greater his or her case may remain in light of foreknowledge of the ice or snow.
Reasonableness in the Courtroom
Coupled with the foreknowledge of the ice and snow on the premises is the ability to affect a reasonable change in light of what accumulates on the property. If there is a snow or ice storm that will occur, the property owner can place down salt, sand or another substance to help prevent freezing or slick surfaces. However, he or she may not have the opportunity or time to do so. Other measures can occur that support the removal of the danger such as taking an ice pick and slowly removing accumulated frozen water.
What the premises owner does is taken into account by the judge or jury along with the knowledge that the ice or snow may cause someone to slip and fall. When considering the premises liability, the courtroom must also ensure that the owner has the ability, means and reasonable efforts to prevent someone suffering an injury. One of these methods could also include a form of insurance for those that do suffer physical harm when crossing the property. This may depend on the state and what is available to the premise owner.
Suing the Premises Owner for Ice and Snow
Related cases for slips, falls, sliding down slick areas and injuries for any combination of factors involving ice and snow usually lead to a lawsuit if the injuries are extensive. Hiring a lawyer is the next step if this person needs to sue the premises owner.
Provided by HG.org
CONTACT US:
Lawyers in Da Nang:
99 Nguyen Huu Tho, Quan Hai Chau, Da Nang city
Lawyers in Hue:
56A Dien Bien Phu, Hue City, Thua Thien Hue
336 Phan Chu Trinh, Hue City, Thua Thien Hue
Lawyers in Phu Quoc:
65 Hung Vuong, Duong Dong town, Phu Quoc island district
Lawyers in Quang Ngai:
359 Nguyen Du, Quang Ngai City, Quang Ngai Province.
Lawyers in Ha Noi:
Room 501, 5th Floor, No. 11, Lane No. 183, Dang Tien Dong Street, Dong Da District, Ha Noi
Lawyers in Nghe An:
No. 19 V.I Lenin street, Vinh City, Nghe An Province
Website: www.fdvn.vn www.fdvnlawfirm.vn www.diendanngheluat.vn www.tuvanphapluatdanang.com
Email: fdvnlawfirm@gmail.com luatsulecao@gmail.com
Phone: 0935 643 666 – 0906 499 446
Fanpage LUẬT SƯ FDVN: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirm/
Legal Service For Expat: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirmvietnam/
TỦ SÁCH NGHỀ LUẬT: https://www.facebook.com/SayMeNgheLuat/
DIỄN ĐÀN NGHỀ LUẬT: https://www.facebook.com/groups/saymengheluat/
Other Articles
- ĐIỀU KIỆN PHÁT SINH QUYỀN TÁC GIẢ ĐỐI VỚI TÁC PHẨM DO TRÍ TUỆ NHÂN TẠO TẠO RA THEO NGHỊ ĐỊNH 134/2026/NĐ-CP / CONDITIONS FOR EMERGENCE OF COPYRIGHT PROTECTION OF AI-GENERATED WORKS UNDER DECREE NO. 134/2026/ND-CP
- HƯỚNG DẪN QUY TRÌNH XÁC THỰC ĐIỆN TỬ ĐỐI VỚI NGƯỜI NỘP HỒ SƠ VÀ NGƯỜI UỶ QUYỀN NỘP HỒ SƠ ĐĂNG KÝ DOANH NGHIỆP CỦA CỤC PHÁT TRIỂN DOANH NGHIỆP TƯ NHÂN VÀ KINH TẾ TẬP THỂ
- THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT AND BUSINESS LAW BY DON MAYER, DANIEL M. WARNER, GEORGE J.SIEDEL, JETHRO K. LIEBERMAN AND ALYSSA ROSE MARTINA
- TRANSNATIONAL COMMERCIAL LAW (SECOND EDITION) BY ROY GOODE, HERBERT KRONKE AND EWAN MCKENDRICK
- BÀI HỌC TIẾNG ANH PHÁP LÝ: DAMAGES
- LEGAL RESEARCH: HOW TO FIND AND UNDERSTAND THE LAW BY ATTORNEYS STEPHEN ELIAS AND SUSAN LEVINKIND (EDITED BY RICHARD STIM)
- DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT: COMPENSATION, RESTITUTION, AND VINDICATION BY DAVID PEARCE AND ROGER HALSON
- CONTRACT LAW BY MINDY CHEN-WISHART
- A HISTORY OF CONTRACT AT COMMON LAW BY S.J.STOLJAR
- HƯỚNG DẪN CÁCH TÍNH ƯU ĐÃI TRONG LỰA CHỌN NHÀ ĐẦU TƯ THEO NGHỊ ĐỊNH 243/2025//NĐ-CP QUY ĐỊNH CHI TIẾT MỘT SỐ ĐIỀU CỦA LUẬT ĐẦU TƯ THEO PHƯƠNG THỨC ĐỐI TÁC CÔNG TƯ
- NĂM 2026, LÀM KHAI SINH CHẬM CÓ BỊ PHẠT TIỀN KHÔNG? / IN 2026, IS A DELAY IN BIRTH REGISTRATION FINED?
- QUY ĐỊNH XỬ PHẠT VI PHẠM HÀNH CHÍNH ĐỐI VỚI TRƯỜNG HỢP DOANH NGHIỆP KINH DOANH DỊCH VỤ LỮ HÀNH CÓ KHÁCH DU LỊCH TRỐN Ở LẠI NƯỚC NGOÀI HOẶC TRỐN Ở LẠI VIỆT NAM TRÁI PHÁP LUẬT TỪ NGÀY 15/02/2026
- CHẾ ĐỘ TÀI SẢN CỦA VỢ CHỒNG THEO THỎA THUẬN TRONG HÔN NHÂN CÓ YẾU TỐ NƯỚC NGOÀI / AGREEMENT ON MATRIMONIAL PROPERTY REGIME IN MARRIAGES INVOLVING FOREIGN ELEMENTS
- LEGAL ENGLISH FOR LAW STUDENT BY TIRA NUR FITRIA S.PD., M.PD.
- AN INTRODUCTION TO LAW BY PHIL HARRIS
- NGHỊ ĐỊNH 212/2026/NĐ-CP QUY ĐỊNH VỀ ĐIỀU KIỆN NĂNG LỰC HOẠT ĐỘNG XÂY DỰNG, HỆ THỐNG THÔNG TIN, CƠ SỞ DỮ LIỆU QUỐC GIA VỀ HOẠT ĐỘNG XÂY DỰNG CÓ HIỆU LỰC TỪ NGÀY 01/07/2026



