As Kent Greenwalt's second volume on aspects of legal interpretation, this book analyzes statutory and common law interpretation and compares the two. In respect to statutory interpretation, it first asks whether judges are "faithful agents" of the legislature or "independent cooperative partners." It concludes that the obvious answer is that neither simple categorization really fits-that the function of judges involves a combination of roles. The next issue addressed is whether the intent of those in authority matters for interpreting the kinds of instructions contained in statutes. At the general level, the answer is "yes." This answer follows even if one thinks interpretation should concentrate on the understanding of readers, because readers themselves would treat intentions as part of the relevant context of the language of statutes. It would take some special reasons, such as constitutional structure or unreliability, to discount actual intents of legislators and use of legislative history. The book argues that none of these special reasons are convincing. On the question whether judges should focus on the language of specific provision or overall purpose, both are relevant, and purpose should become more important as time passes. In an analysis of various other features of statutory interpretation, the book claims that presidential signing statements should not have weight, that subsequent legislative actions short of new statutes should only occasionally carry importance, that "canons of interpretation," such as the rule of lenity, can provide some, limited, guidance, and that there are special reasons for courts to adhere to precedents in statutory cases, but these should not yield any absolute rule. A chapter on administrative interpretation of statutes claims that the standards agencies apply should differ to a degree from those of courts and that judicial deference to those interpretations is ordinarily warranted.
The book's second part, on common law interpretation, considers the force of precedents, resisting any simple dichotomy between holding and dictum. It also defends the use of reasoning by analogy, not only in the initial stages thinking about a problem, but also in respect to some final justifications for decisions. An examination of the place of rules, principles, and policies argues that all three are relevant in common law interpretation; and shows that common law interpretation is not reducible to any formula.
A final chapter compares statutory and common law interpretation, similarities and differences, how each can affect the other, and the significance of having a legal system in which they both play prominent roles.
The contents of shared books and materials express the authors' point of view, not FDVN Lawyers'. We back up and store them for academic and non-commercial purposes. We object to using these books and materials for commercial purposes.
Link for ebook: STATUTORY AND COMMON LAW INTERPRETATION – KENT GREENAWALT
(1).jpg)
CONTACT US:
Lawyers in Da Nang:
99 Nguyen Huu Tho, Quan Hai Chau, Da Nang city
Lawyers in Hue:
56A Dien Bien Phu, Hue City, Thua Thien Hue
Lawyers in Ho Chi Minh City:
No. 122 Dinh Bo Linh Street, Binh Thanh District, Ho Chi Minh City
Lawyers in Ha Noi:
Room 501, 5th Floor, No. 11, Lane No. 183, Dang Tien Dong Street, Dong Da District, Ha Noi
Lawyers in Nghe An:
No. 19 V.I Lenin street, Vinh City, Nghe An Province
Website: www.fdvn.vn www.fdvnlawfirm.vn www.diendanngheluat.vn www.tuvanphapluatdanang.com
Email: fdvnlawfirm@gmail.com luatsulecao@gmail.com
Phone: 0935 643 666 – 0906 499 446
Fanpage LUẬT SƯ FDVN: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirm/
Legal Service For Expat: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirmvietnam/
TỦ SÁCH NGHỀ LUẬT: https://www.facebook.com/SayMeNgheLuat/
DIỄN ĐÀN NGHỀ LUẬT: https://www.facebook.com/groups/saymengheluat/
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/c/luatsufdvn
Telegram: https://t.me/luatsufdvn
Group “Legal forum for foreigners in Vietnam”: https://www.facebook.com/groups/legalforeignersinvietnam
Other Articles
- THE LAW OF INTERNATIONAL LAWYERS BY WOUTER WERNER, MARIEKE DE HOON AND ALEXIS GALÁN
- ABSOLUTE LEGAL ENGLISH BY HELEN CALLANAN AND LYNDA EDWARDS
- THE OXFORD HANDBOOK OF LEGAL STUDIES EDITED BY PETER CANE AND MARK TUSHNET
- DUE DILIGENCE IN THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ORDER EDITED BY HEIKE KRIEGER, ANNE PETERS AND LEONHARD KREUZER
- TỔNG HỢP ĐỀ THI IELTS WRITING 2026
- TỔNG HỢP 10 BẢN ÁN CỦA TOÀ ÁN VƯƠNG QUỐC ANH GIẢI QUYẾT TRANH CHẤP SA THẢI NGƯỜI LAO ĐỘNG / COLLECTION OF 10 JUDGMENTS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM COURTS ON EMPLOYMENT DISMISSAL DISPUTES
- CHA, MẸ LÀ NGƯỜI NƯỚC NGOÀI ĐĂNG KÝ KHAI SINH CHO CON TẠI VIỆT NAM NHƯ THẾ NÀO? / HOW CAN FOREIGN PARENTS REGISTER THE BIRTH OF THEIR CHILD IN VIETNAM?
- QUY ĐỊNH VỀ CHUYỂN NHƯỢNG DỰ ÁN ĐẦU TƯ THEO LUẬT ĐẦU TƯ 2025 / REGULATIONS ON THE TRANSFER OF INVESTMENT PROJECTS UNDER THE 2025 LAW ON INVESTMENT
- TỔNG HỢP 08 MẪU HỢP ĐỒNG GIA CÔNG CÔNG NGHIỆP VÀ DỊCH VỤ QUỐC TẾ / COLLECTION OF 08 TEMPLATES INTERNATIONAL PROCESSING AND OUTSOURCING AGREEMENT
- TỔNG HỢP 10 BẢN ÁN CỦA TOÀ ÁN SINGAPORE VỀ TRANH CHẤP HỢP ĐỒNG KINH DOANH - THƯƠNG MẠI CÓ ĐƯƠNG SỰ LÀ DOANH NGHIỆP VIỆT NAM / COLLECTION OF 10 SINGAPORE COURT JUDGMENTS ON BUSINESS & COMMERCIAL CONTRACT DISPUTES INVOLVING VIETNAMESE ENTERPRISES AS LITIGAN
- HƯỚNG DẪN CÁCH TÍNH THUẾ TIÊU THỤ ĐẶC BIỆT ĐỐI VỚI MẶT HÀNG THUỐC LÁ / GUIDANCE ON EXCISE TAX CALCULATION FOR TOBACCO
- THÔNG TƯ 121/2026/TT-BTC SỬA ĐỔI, BỔ SUNG MỘT SỐ ĐIỀU CỦA THÔNG TƯ 68/2025/TT-BTC NGÀY 01 THÁNG 07 NĂM 2025 CỦA BỘ TÀI CHÍNH BAN HÀNH BIỂU MẪU SỬ DỤNG TRONG ĐĂNG KÝ DOANH NGHIỆP, HỘ KINH DOANH
- BÀI HỌC TIẾNG ANH PHÁP LÝ: TỔNG HỢP ĐỀ THI IELTS READING 2026
- THE ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF CORPORATE LAW: WHAT IS CORPORATE LAW BY JOHN ARMOUR, HENRY HANSMANN, REINIER KRAAKMAN
- THE PATHOLOGICAL POLITICS OF CRIMINAL LAW BY WILLIAM J. STUNTZ
- THỦ TỤC ĐỔI BẰNG LÁI XE NƯỚC NGOÀI SANG VIỆT NAM CHO NGƯỜI NƯỚC NGOÀI 2026 / PROCEDURE FOR CONVERTING A FOREIGN DRIVING LICENSE INTO A VIETNAMESE DRIVING LICENSE FOR FOREIGNERS IN 2026



