As Kent Greenwalt's second volume on aspects of legal interpretation, this book analyzes statutory and common law interpretation and compares the two. In respect to statutory interpretation, it first asks whether judges are "faithful agents" of the legislature or "independent cooperative partners." It concludes that the obvious answer is that neither simple categorization really fits-that the function of judges involves a combination of roles. The next issue addressed is whether the intent of those in authority matters for interpreting the kinds of instructions contained in statutes. At the general level, the answer is "yes." This answer follows even if one thinks interpretation should concentrate on the understanding of readers, because readers themselves would treat intentions as part of the relevant context of the language of statutes. It would take some special reasons, such as constitutional structure or unreliability, to discount actual intents of legislators and use of legislative history. The book argues that none of these special reasons are convincing. On the question whether judges should focus on the language of specific provision or overall purpose, both are relevant, and purpose should become more important as time passes. In an analysis of various other features of statutory interpretation, the book claims that presidential signing statements should not have weight, that subsequent legislative actions short of new statutes should only occasionally carry importance, that "canons of interpretation," such as the rule of lenity, can provide some, limited, guidance, and that there are special reasons for courts to adhere to precedents in statutory cases, but these should not yield any absolute rule. A chapter on administrative interpretation of statutes claims that the standards agencies apply should differ to a degree from those of courts and that judicial deference to those interpretations is ordinarily warranted.
The book's second part, on common law interpretation, considers the force of precedents, resisting any simple dichotomy between holding and dictum. It also defends the use of reasoning by analogy, not only in the initial stages thinking about a problem, but also in respect to some final justifications for decisions. An examination of the place of rules, principles, and policies argues that all three are relevant in common law interpretation; and shows that common law interpretation is not reducible to any formula.
A final chapter compares statutory and common law interpretation, similarities and differences, how each can affect the other, and the significance of having a legal system in which they both play prominent roles.
The contents of shared books and materials express the authors' point of view, not FDVN Lawyers'. We back up and store them for academic and non-commercial purposes. We object to using these books and materials for commercial purposes.
Link for ebook: STATUTORY AND COMMON LAW INTERPRETATION – KENT GREENAWALT
(1).jpg)
CONTACT US:
Lawyers in Da Nang:
99 Nguyen Huu Tho, Quan Hai Chau, Da Nang city
Lawyers in Hue:
56A Dien Bien Phu, Hue City, Thua Thien Hue
Lawyers in Ho Chi Minh City:
No. 122 Dinh Bo Linh Street, Binh Thanh District, Ho Chi Minh City
Lawyers in Ha Noi:
Room 501, 5th Floor, No. 11, Lane No. 183, Dang Tien Dong Street, Dong Da District, Ha Noi
Lawyers in Nghe An:
No. 19 V.I Lenin street, Vinh City, Nghe An Province
Website: www.fdvn.vn www.fdvnlawfirm.vn www.diendanngheluat.vn www.tuvanphapluatdanang.com
Email: fdvnlawfirm@gmail.com luatsulecao@gmail.com
Phone: 0935 643 666 – 0906 499 446
Fanpage LUẬT SƯ FDVN: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirm/
Legal Service For Expat: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirmvietnam/
TỦ SÁCH NGHỀ LUẬT: https://www.facebook.com/SayMeNgheLuat/
DIỄN ĐÀN NGHỀ LUẬT: https://www.facebook.com/groups/saymengheluat/
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/c/luatsufdvn
Telegram: https://t.me/luatsufdvn
Group “Legal forum for foreigners in Vietnam”: https://www.facebook.com/groups/legalforeignersinvietnam
Other Articles
- TỔNG LƯỢC 08 ÁN LỆ MỚI NHẤT CÓ HIỆU LỰC TỪ NGÀY 01/7/2026 / OVERVIEW OF 8 NEW CASE LAWS EFFECTIVE FROM JULY 1, 2026
- LEARNING LEGAL ENGLISH WITH FDVN LAW FIRM: WHILST AND WHILE
- THỜI HẠN GIAO NỘP TÀI LIỆU, CHỨNG CỨ TRONG VỤ ÁN DÂN SỰ / TIME LIMIT FOR SUBMISSION OF DOCUMENTS AND EVIDENCE IN CIVIL CASES
- THỜI ĐIỂM NỘP VĂN BẢN TRÌNH BÀY Ý KIẾN CỦA BỊ ĐƠN VỀ NỘI DUNG KHỞI KIỆN CỦA NGUYÊN ĐƠN / TIME LIMIT FOR A DEFENDANT TO SUBMIT A WRITTEN STATEMENT OF OPINION ON THE PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS
- NGƯỜI LAO ĐỘNG ỦY QUYỀN CHO CÁ NHÂN KHÁC NHẬN LƯƠNG THÌ CÓ CẦN CÔNG CHỨNG, CHỨNG THỰC VĂN BẢN ỦY QUYỀN KHÔNG? / IS NOTARIZATION OR CERTIFICATION REQUIRED WHEN AN EMPLOYEE AUTHORIZES ANOTHER PERSON TO RECEIVE SALARY ON HIS/HER BEHALF?
- TỔNG HỢP 12 MẪU HỢP ĐỒNG HỢP TÁC CỦA MỘT SỐ QUỐC GIA TRÊN THẾ GIỚI / COLLECTION OF 12 COOPERATION AGREEMENTS FROM VARIOUS COUNTRIES AROUND THE WORLD
- TỔNG HỢP MỘT SỐ BÀI BÁO PHÁP LÝ QUỐC TẾ VỀ BẢO VỆ DỮ LIỆU / COLLECTION INTERNATIONAL ARTICLES ON DATA PROTECTION
- PHÂN BIỆT GIÁM HỘ & ĐẠI DIỆN TRONG DÂN SỰ / DISTINCTION BETWEEN GUARDIANSHIP & CIVIL REPRESENTATION
- ĐIỀU KIỆN, HỒ SƠ VÀ TRÌNH TỰ CÔNG NHẬN, CHO THI HÀNH BẢN ÁN LY HÔN CỦA TÒA ÁN NƯỚC NGOÀI TẠI VIỆT NAM
- TRÁCH NHIỆM KHI KHÔNG CHẤP HÀNH QUYẾT ĐỊNH THI HÀNH ÁN / LIABILITIES UPON FAILURE OF COMPLIANCE WITH ENFORCEMENT DECISION
- KHÔNG NHƯỜNG ĐƯỜNG CHO XE RẼ PHẢI CÓ BỊ PHẠT KHÔNG? / IS FAILURE TO YIELD TO VEHICLES TURNING RIGHT FINED?
- BỒI THƯỜNG KHI NGỘ ĐỘC THỰC PHẨM / COMPENSATION UPON FOOD POISONING
- TỰ CẢI TẠO NHÀ CHUNG CƯ THEO SỞ THÍCH CỦA MÌNH THÌ CÓ ĐƯỢC HAY KHÔNG? / IT IS POSSIBLE TO RENOVATE THE APARTMENT ACCORDING TO THE OWNER’S PREFERENCES?
- TRÁCH NHIỆM XE TẬP LÁI KHI GÂY RA TAI NẠN / RESPONSIBILITIES OF VEHICLES FOR TRAINING UPON ACCIDENT
- TỔNG HỢP 100 TỪ VỰNG VÀ CỤM TỪ TIẾNG ANH PHÁP LÝ THÔNG DỤNG
- TỔNG HỢP ĐỀ THI TOEIC READING / COLLECTION OF TOEIC READING TEST



