_001.png)
"As in-house counsel, you already know that poorly drafted documents, especially emails, can hurt your company, e.g., M&A deals can get derailed or litigation extended. You can find examples every day of “bad” emails being read in court. Labels like “confidential,” “company private,” “restricted,” and “proprietary” will not protect documents from being obtained through proper legal process.
Below are ten things you can use in your daily dealings and conversations with the business to help limit problems that can arise from poorly prepared documents. I have included some links to other resources as well. A lot is focused on emails, but the rules apply to pretty much any written communication (including instant messages and recorded voicemails). Feel free to cut and paste these into your own check-list or email (or however you best can get the word out at your company).
- Understand that emails are business communications. Treat them as such, just as you would if you were writing a “formal” business letter. Your company should have an email/document policy spelling out what is expected from employees when preparing any work-related communication. If you have a policy, enforce it, and get the tone set from the top.
- Prepare emails & documents with the knowledge that they may be seen by third parties and/or published on page one of the New York Times. I used to tell folks to pretend that every email you write starts with “Dear Government Regulator” or “Dear Company Suing Us” and then think about how that affects what you write.
- Don’t write emails when you are angry. Take time to cool off. It may feel good at first, but you will inevitably regret firing off an email in the heat of the moment.
- Mark draft documents as “Draft-Subject to Revision” (on every page) and delete drafts as soon as the next version is ready or, if necessary, when the final version is prepared. It’s difficult to say something was just a draft when it’s not marked as a “draft.”
- Avoid absolute or dogmatic statements. Things are rarely “black and white.” Use words like “usually,” “sometimes,” “mostly,” “apparently”, etc. to show nuance and that circumstances matter. PowerPoint lends is self to short, declarative sentences. But, when your document is flashed up a big screen in front of a jury, it’s hard to later say “I meant ‘sometimes’ that is the case.” That may have been what you meant, but it’s not what you wrote.
- Don’t speculate about legal issues – leave that for legal, e.g., don’t write “we breached the contract”. You simply may not be aware of all of the contractual obligations and how to truly interpret the agreement or the facts. If you need legal advice, ask the legal department directly and be sure it is clear in the body of the email that you are seeking legal advice so as to best maintain any applicable privilege.
- No profanity/off-color humor. No matter how funny you may be in real life, regulators, judges, and juries will not appreciate it. These are business documents. Treat them like it. Same thing goes for “funny” pictures in presentations. These can and will be taken out of context by the other side in a dispute.
- Avoid “gung-ho” statements e.g., “dominate the market,” “destroy a competitor,” “leverage our dominant position,” or “impede a competitor/competition”. These types of statements may get the testosterone pumped up but they can come back to bite you in court. Be boring and stick to the facts. It’s a business document. Treat it like that.
- Project names matter, e.g., “Project Death Star” may be funny to you, but will not be funny to the jury. Keep project names boring.
- Don’t send an email telling someone to destroy or delete emails/documents (e.g., “delete this email after reading”). This type of email is probably worse than whatever was in the email you were trying to get deleted. Trying to explain what you really meant will likely be hard. And, once you send an email, you can pretty much bet it will be around for years and years regardless of any instruction to delete it. I used to tell my folks “The only things left after full-out global nuclear war will be cockroaches and regrettable emails.”
CONTACT US
Lawyers in Da Nang:
99 Nguyen Huu Tho, Quan Hai Chau, Da Nang city
Lawyers in Hue:
336 Phan Chu Trinh, Hue City, Thua Thien Hue
Lawyers in Phu Quoc:
65 Hung Vuong, Duong Dong town, Phu Quoc island district
Lawyers in Quang Ngai:
359 Nguyen Du, Quang Ngai City, Quang Ngai Province.
Lawyers in Ha Noi
45C Tran Quoc Toan, Tran Hung Dạo, Hoang Kiem, Ha Noi
Website: www.fdvn.vn www.fdvnlawfirm.vn www.diendanngheluat.vn www.tuvanphapluatdanang.com
Email: fdvnlawfirm@gmail.com luatsulecao@gmail.com
Phone: 0935 643 666 – 0906 499 446
Fanpage LUẬT SƯ FDVN: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirm/
Legal Service For Expat: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirmvietnam/
TỦ SÁCH NGHỀ LUẬT: https://www.facebook.com/SayMeNgheLuat/
DIỄN ĐÀN NGHỀ LUẬT: https://www.facebook.com/groups/saymengheluat/
Other Articles
- TỔNG HỢP 08 BẢN ÁN CỦA CÁC TOÀ ÁN VƯƠNG QUỐC ANH VỀ TRANH CHẤP GIỮA CÁC CỔ ĐÔNG CÔNG TY / COLLECTION OF 08 JUDGMENTS OF THE COURTS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM CORCERNING BETWEEN SHAREHOLDERS
- BÀI HỌC TIẾNG ANH PHÁP LÝ: IMPACT
- TỔNG HỢP 90 ÁN LỆ SONG NGỮ VIỆT - ANH / COLLECTION OF 90 BILINGUAL CASE LAWS
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 83/2026/AL VỀ TRÁCH NHIỆM BỒI THƯỜNG CỦA DOANH NGHIỆP BẢO HIỂM KHI CƠ QUAN CÓ THẨM QUYỀN CHƯA XÁC ĐỊNH ĐƯỢC NGƯỜI GÂY RA THIỆT HẠI VỀ TÀI SẢN / CASE LAW NO. 83/2026/AL ON THE INDEMNIFICATION LIABILITY OF AN INSURANCE ENTERPRISE WHERE THE COMPETEN
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 84/2026/AL VỀ CHẤM DỨT VIỆC NUÔI CON NUÔI LÀ NGƯỜI CHƯA THÀNH NIÊN KHI NGƯỜI NHẬN CON NUÔI LÀ NGƯỜI ĐỘC THÂN CHẾT / CASE LAW NO. 84/2026/AL ON TERMINATION OF THE ADOPTIVE RELATIONSHIP WITH A MINOR ADOPTEE WHERE THE SINGLE ADOPTIVE PARENT DIES
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 85/2026/AL VỀ VIỆC THAM GIA TỐ TỤNG CỦA DOANH NGHIỆP BẢO HIỂM THÀNH VIÊN THEO HỢP ĐỒNG NGUYÊN TẮC ĐỒNG BẢO HIỂM / CASE LAW NO. 85/2026/AL ON THE PARTICIPATION IN PROCEEDINGS OF MEMBER INSURANCE ENTERPRISES UNDER A CO-INSURANCE FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 86/2026/AL VỀ SỰ KIỆN PHÁP LÝ LÀM PHÁT SINH CĂN CỨ ĐỂ XEM XÉT KHÁNG NGHỊ THEO THỦ TỤC TÁI THẨM / CASE LAW NO. 86/2026/AL ON A LEGAL EVENT GIVING RISE TO GROUNDS FOR CONSIDERATION OF A PROTEST UNDER REOPENING PROCEDURES
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 87/2026/AL VỀ THỨ TỰ ƯU TIÊN THANH TOÁN KHI XỬ LÝ TÀI SẢN BẢO ĐẢM / CASE LAW NO. 87/2026/AL ON PRIORITY OF PAYMENT UPON ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY ASSETS
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 88/2026/AL VỀ ỦY QUYỀN THAM GIA TỐ TỤNG TRONG VỤ ÁN TRANH CHẤP VỀ NUÔI CON / CASE LAW NO. 88/2026/AL ON AUTHORIZATION TO PARTICIPATE IN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS IN A CHILD CUSTODY DISPUTE CASE
- BÀI HỌC TIẾNG ANH PHÁP LÝ: CẤU TRÚC UNLESS
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 89/2026/AL VỀ VIỆC BỒI THƯỜNG, HỖ TRỢ KHI NHÀ NƯỚC THU HỒI ĐẤT ĐỐI VỚI TÀI SẢN LÀ NHÀ MUA THANH LÝ ĐỂ Ở TRÊN ĐẤT CỦA CƠ QUAN NHÀ NƯỚC / CASE LAW NO. 89/2026/AL ON COMPENSATION AND SUPPORT UPON STATE RECOVERY OF LAND FOR HOUSES PURCHASED THROUGH L
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 90/2026/AL VỀ THẨM QUYỀN HỦY GIẤY CHỨNG NHẬN QUYỀN SỬ DỤNG ĐẤT CỦA TÒA ÁN / CASE LAW NO. 90/2026/AL RE: ON THE COURT’S AUTHORITY TO REVOKE A LAND USE RIGHTS CERTIFICATE
- TỔNG LƯỢC 08 ÁN LỆ MỚI NHẤT CÓ HIỆU LỰC TỪ NGÀY 01/7/2026 / OVERVIEW OF 8 NEW CASE LAWS EFFECTIVE FROM JULY 1, 2026
- LEARNING LEGAL ENGLISH WITH FDVN LAW FIRM: WHILST AND WHILE
- THỜI HẠN GIAO NỘP TÀI LIỆU, CHỨNG CỨ TRONG VỤ ÁN DÂN SỰ / TIME LIMIT FOR SUBMISSION OF DOCUMENTS AND EVIDENCE IN CIVIL CASES
- THỜI ĐIỂM NỘP VĂN BẢN TRÌNH BÀY Ý KIẾN CỦA BỊ ĐƠN VỀ NỘI DUNG KHỞI KIỆN CỦA NGUYÊN ĐƠN / TIME LIMIT FOR A DEFENDANT TO SUBMIT A WRITTEN STATEMENT OF OPINION ON THE PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS



