
The year 2015 witnessed numerous developments in trade relations between Vietnam and foreign partners. In particular, after a decade of preparation, Vietnam has finally become the 84th member state of the Convention on Contract for International Sale of Goods (CISG)1 which will bring sale contracts between Vietnamese and foreign parties closer to international standards. Furthermore, on 4 February 2016, Vietnam, along with other 11 member countries, signed the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a high-standard free trade agreement which covers approximately 30 percent of the global GDP.2 Besides, on 2 December 2015, Vietnam and the EU finally declared the completion of negotiation of the EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement (EVFTA). Thistreaty marks an important achievement of the 25-year bilateral ties between Vietnam and the EU and is regarded as the beginning of a strategic partnership with unlimited potential between the two partners. By joining these two remarkable treaties, Vietnam has actually adopted the two contentious models of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) (ie, the traditional investment arbitration promoted by the United States in the TPP and a brand new system of investment court initiated by the European Commission in the EVFTA).
Apart from the accession to these international treaties, new national legislation was promulgated in 2015 which is believed to create significant changes to the substantive as well as procedural legal matters in Vietnam. Such legislation, both international and domestic, will definitely bring interesting changes to arbitration practices in Vietnam. This article aims at introducing an overview on the changes in the legal framework as a result of the promulgation of new legislation in Vietnam and their potential impacts regarding arbitration and ADR.
The contents of shared document and materials express the authors' point of view, not FDVN Lawyers'. We back up and store them for academic and non-commercial purposes. We object to using these books and materials for commercial purposes.
Link PDF: THE ASIA-PACIFIC ARBITRATION REVIEW 2017
.jpg)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Articles
- DOING BUSINESS IN VIETNAM: A GUIDE TO THE REASONING, NOT THE RULES SO THAT WHEN THE LAW CHANGES, YOU ALREADY KNOW WHERE TO LOOK BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC
- TỔNG HỢP THUẬT NGỮ PHÁP LÝ TIẾNG ANH THÔNG DỤNG DÀNH CHO DOANH NGHIỆP
- LAWYER'S POKER: 52 LESSONS THAT LAWYERS CAN LEARN FROM CARD PLAYER BY STEVEN LUBET
- BÀI HỌC TIẾNG ANH PHÁP LÝ: ACCORDING TO
- LAWYERS, LIARS, AND THE ART OF STORYTELLING BY JONATHAN SHAPIRO
- NGHỊ ĐỊNH SỐ 385/2026/NĐ-CP CỦA CHÍNH PHỦ VỀ KIỂM SOÁT THỦ TỤC HÀNH CHÍNH
- VENTURE CAPITAL MODEL AGREEMENT WITH COMMENTARY: A CLAUSE-BY-CLAUSE GUIDE FOR LAWYERS IN ANY JURISDICTION BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC
- NGHỊ ĐỊNH 371/2026/NĐ-CP QUY ĐỊNH CHI TIẾT VIỆC TUYỂN DỤNG, QUẢN LÝ NGƯỜI LAO ĐỘNG VIỆT NAM LÀM VIỆC CHO CÁC TỔ CHỨC, CÁ NHÂN NƯỚC NGOÀI TẠI VIỆT NAM
- THỦ TỤC XIN CẤP LÝ LỊCH TƯ PHÁP CHO NGƯỜI NƯỚC NGOÀI 2026 / PROCEDURES FOR OBTAINING CRIMINAL RECORDS FOR FOREIGNERS IN 2026
- THỦ TỤC HƯỞNG BẢO HIỂM XÃ HỘI MỘT LẦN CHO NGƯỜI NƯỚC NGOÀI 2026 / PROCEDURES FOR LUMP-SUM SOCIAL INSURANCE ALLOWANCE FOR FOREIGNERS IN 2026
- THE HAPPY LAWYER: MAKING A GOOD LIFE IN THE LAW BY NANCY LEVIT & DOUGLAS O.LINDER
- VIETNAM INVESTMENT PROMOTION GUIDEBOOK 2026 BY VIETNAM TRADE PROMOTION AGENCY - MINISTRY OF INDUSTRY AND TRADE
- THE COMMERCIAL LAWYER'S MIND: UNDERSTANDING BUSINESS WITHOUT BECOMING A BANKER (A PRACTICAL GUIDE FOR LAW STUDENTS AND JUNIOR COMMERCIAL LAWYERS) BY BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC
- QUY ĐỊNH VỀ KHOẢN VAY NƯỚC NGOÀI, HỒ SƠ, THỦ TỤC ĐĂNG KÝ KHOẢN VAY NƯỚC NGOÀI VỚI NGÂN HÀNG NHÀ NƯỚC / REGULATIONS ON FOREIGN LOANS, DOSSIER AND PROCEDURES FOR REGISTRATION OF FOREIGN LOANS WITH THE STATE BANK
- BÀI HỌC TIẾNG ANH PHÁP LÝ: IN VIEW OF
- TỔNG HỢP 10 BẢN ÁN CỦA TOÀ ÁN VƯƠNG QUỐC ANH GIẢI QUYẾT TRANH CHẤP QUYỀN SỞ HỮU TRÍ TUỆ ĐỐI VỚI PHẦN MỀM / COLLECTION 10 UNITED KINGDOM COURT JUDMENTS ON SOFTWARE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DISPUTES



