On November 18, 2020, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) updated policy guidance in its Policy Manual to clarify circumstances in which an applicant may be found ineligible for naturalization if the applicant was not lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence.
The update affirmed previous USCIS policy that an applicant is ineligible for naturalization if the permanent resident status (LPR) was obtained in error, even in the absence of fraud or willful misrepresentation. Some examples of agency in the process of obtaining LPR status that generally render the applicant ineligible for naturalization include:
- The U.S. Department of State (DOS) incorrectly approved an alien’s immigrant visa application and issued a visa;
- USCIS incorrectly approved an alien’s adjustment application; or
- The alien was otherwise mistakenly admitted as an LPR.
The update clarifies that USCIS will review whether an applicant for naturalization has abandoned his or her permanent resident status during the adjudication of the naturalization application. If an immigration services officer determines that the applicant has failed to meet the burden of establishing maintenance of LPR status, USCIS may deny the application and place the applicant in removal proceedings by issuing a Notice to Appear. The update also clarifies that applicants in removal proceedings may not naturalize if they’re naturalization application was file on or after November 18, 2020.
The new update is generally consistent with previous USCIS policy which rendered applicants ineligible for naturalization after a finding that the permanent residence was improperly granted. What is quite troubling is that under the new policy guidance USCIS has now the authority to determine that an LPR, who was admitted to the United States by the Custom and Border Protection (CBP), may have abandoned permanent residence status for failure to meet the continuous residence requirements. In other words, USCIS may overrule a CBP determination that an LPR has not abandoned status at the time of returning from a trip overseas.
USCIS officers are instructed to examine extended and frequent absences from the United States to determine LPR status abandonment during the review of a naturalization application and interview. Applicants will no longer be able to establish LPR status even if permitted to return to the United States as an LPR at a port of entry. In order to demonstrate that an applicant did not abandon LPR status, an applicant must establish that he or she has not objectively intended to abandon LPR status. To assess maintenance of LPR status, USCIS will review multiple factors including length of absence from the United States, purpose of travel outside the United States, intent to return to the United States as an LPR, and continued ties to the United States. A finding of abandonment of LPR status by a parent will be imputed to a minor child who is in the parent’s custody and control.
The new guidance will likely deter applicants with extensive travel outside United States from applying for naturalization. Additionally, further agency interpretation may lead to USCIS implementing the policy in the context of other affirmative immigration applications, such as Application for Advance Parole (Form I-131) and Application to Renew Permanent Resident Status (Form I-90).
While there are questions concerning the legality of the new policy, LPRs with extensive travel overseas should carefully consider moving forward with filing an application for naturalization. LPRs considering extensive travel outside United States should plan accordingly to preserve permanent residence.
By Charlotte Immigration Law Firm, North Carolina
CONTACT US
Lawyers in Da Nang:
99 Nguyen Huu Tho, Quan Hai Chau, Da Nang city
Lawyers in Hue:
56A Dien Bien Phu, Hue City, Thua Thien Hue
336 Phan Chu Trinh, Hue City, Thua Thien Hue
Lawyers in Phu Quoc:
65 Hung Vuong, Duong Dong town, Phu Quoc island district
Lawyers in Quang Ngai:
359 Nguyen Du, Quang Ngai City, Quang Ngai Province.
Lawyers in Ha Noi:
Room 501, 5th Floor, No. 11, Lane No. 183, Dang Tien Dong Street, Dong Da District, Ha Noi
Lawyers in Nghe An:
No. 19 V.I Lenin street, Vinh City, Nghe An Province
Website: www.fdvn.vn www.fdvnlawfirm.vn www.diendanngheluat.vn www.tuvanphapluatdanang.com
Email: fdvnlawfirm@gmail.com luatsulecao@gmail.com
Phone: 0935 643 666 – 0906 499 446
Fanpage LUẬT SƯ FDVN: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirm/
Legal Service For Expat: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirmvietnam/
TỦ SÁCH NGHỀ LUẬT: https://www.facebook.com/SayMeNgheLuat/
DIỄN ĐÀN NGHỀ LUẬT: https://www.facebook.com/groups/saymengheluat/
Other Articles
- BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY (ABRIDGED TENTH EDITION) BY BRYAN A.GARNER
- CẤU TRÚC “NOT ONLY … BUT ALSO …”
- THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE DEAL: THE STRUCTURES THAT DEFINES A DECADE OF GLOBAL M&A BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC
- ACADEMIC LEGAL WRITING: LAW REVIEW ARTICLES, STUDENT NOTES, SEMINAR PAPERS, AND GETTING ON LAW REVIEW BY EUGENE VOLOKH
- THE CONTRACT COMPASS BASIS PRINCIPLES FOR DRAFTING AND READING EVERY AGREEMENT BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC
- CÔNG VĂN 7751/BNG-LS CỦA BỘ NGOẠI GIAO NGÀY 03 THÁNG 09 NĂM 2026 VỀ VIỆC TRIỂN KHAI THỰC HIỆN CÔNG ƯỚC APOSTILLE
- PRIVATE M&A NEGOTIATION A PRACTITIONER'S COMPANION TO THE SHARE PURCHASE, SUBSCRIPTION & SHAREHOLDER'S AGREEMENT BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC
- LITIGATION IN TWO WORLDS CIVIL AND CORMMERCIAL COURT PROCEDURE IN VIETNAM AND THE UNITED STATES: A PRACTITIONER'S COMPARATIVE GUIDE BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC
- HƯỚNG DẪN THỰC HIỆN LUẬT THƯƠNG MẠI ĐIỆN TỬ VÀ NGHỊ ĐỊNH 248/2026/NĐ-CP
- THE M&A DICTIONARY BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC
- THE CAMBRIDGE HANDBOOK OF PRIVATE LAW AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE EDITED BY ERNEST LIM AND PHILLIP MORGAN
- ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EDITED BY JYH-AN LEE, RETO M HILTY, AND KUNG-CHUNG LIU
- ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE LAW CYBERCRIME AND CRIMINAL LIABILITY EDITED BY DENNIS J. BAKER AND PAUL H. ROBINSON
- ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN LEGAL SYSTEMS (BRIDGING LAW AND TECHNOLOGY THROUGH AI) EDITED BY ERIONA CELA, NARASIMHA RAO VAJJHALA AND BEHROUZ ASLANI
- NGHỊ ĐỊNH 342/2026/NĐ-CP QUY ĐỊNH CHI TIẾT LUẬT THƯƠNG MẠI VÀ LUẬT QUẢN LÝ NGOẠI THƯƠNG VỀ HOẠT ĐỘNG MUA BÁN HÀNG HOÁ VÀ HOẠT ĐỘNG LIÊN QUAN TRỰC TIẾP ĐẾN MUA BÁN HÀNG HOÁ CỦA NHÀ ĐẦU TƯ NƯỚC NGOÀI, TỔ CHỨC KINH TẾ CÓ VỐN ĐẦU TƯ NƯỚC NGOÀI TẠI VIỆT NAM
- THE LAW OF INTERNATIONAL LAWYERS BY WOUTER WERNER, MARIEKE DE HOON AND ALEXIS GALÁN



