In 2014, my company signed a sale contract with the Branch of Company B. The contract was strictly implemented by the Parties, but until the beginning of 2019, the branch of Company B delayed its delivery obligation. Through many times of conciliation, the representative of Company B believes that a branch of Company B has no authority to sign a contract because it has not been authorized by company B, so the contract is invalid.
I would like to ask if we now want to sue, we will sue Company B or a branch of Company B. If the branch of Company B is not authorized, is the contract valid? Thank you.
FDVN’s Opinions:
Thank you for concerning FDVN’s legal services. Regarding your consulting requests, after studying the relevant legal documents, FDVN Law Firm would like to give you the following advice:
1. Identify the the subject being sued against
According to Clause 1, Article 84 of Civil Code 2015, “Each branch and/or representative office is an affiliate other than a juridical person”.
Besides, Clause 1 of Article 45 of Law on Enterprise 2014 (Clause 1 of Article 44 Law on Enterprise 2020) provides that, “A branch is a unit dependent on the enterprise and obliged to perform part or all of the enterprise’s functions, including representation under authorization…”.
At the same time, it is stipulated in Clause 6, Article 84 of Civil Code 2015 that “A juridical person shall have civil rights and obligations arising from civil transactions established and performed by its representative offices and/or branches.”
Based on the above provisions, Company B must be responsible for the transactions established and performed by a branch of Company B. Therefore, it is necessary to determine that the person sued in this dispute is Company B.
2. If the branch of Company B is not authorized, will the contract be valid?
According to Clause 1, Article 45 of Law on Enterprise 2014, Clause 1, Article 84 of Civil Code 2015 (as analyzed above), a branch is an affiliate, not a juridical person. Therefore, to enter into an economic contract, a branch is required to be authorized by the legal representative of the Company establishing that branch (referred to as "the Company"). The authorization of the Company to the Branch can be proved through the following documents: Contract, power of attorney; the Branch's Charter, operation regulations; Decision to appoint the head of the branch, Decision on assigning tasks and powers to the branch (the head of the branch)...
In the absence of documents or evidence proving that Company B has authorized the Branch to sign the contract, the Contract will not be automatically invalidated, due to the need to consider the recognition factors on the actual contract performance process.
Under Article 142 of Civil Code 2015, a civil transaction entered into and performed by an unauthorized person representative (branch) shall give rise to rights and obligations of the principal (Company) in cases where:
- The principal recognizes the transaction;
- The principal knows it without any objection within an appropriate time limit;
- It is the principal's fault that the other party does not know or is not able to know that the person entering into and performing the civil transaction therewith was unauthorized.
Sub-section 2, Section I of Resolution 04/2003/NQ-HĐTP dated May 27, 2003 of the Judicial Council of the Supreme People's Court stipulates the term of “know it without any objection” as follows:
- After the economic contracts are signed, there are enough grounds to prove that the persons signing these economic contracts have already reported the signing to the competent persons (such reporting is expressed in the minutes of briefings of the directorate, the minutes of meetings of the Members’ Councils or Managing Boards, or many persons confirmed that the reporting had been really made…).
- The competent persons, through accounting as well as statistical vouchers and documents, know that these economic contracts have been signed and are being performed (having signed receipts, ex-warehousing bills or revenues from and expenditures for the performance of these economic contracts or accounting books of legal entities…).
- The competent persons have had acts which prove that they have participated in exercising rights and obligations arising under the agreements in the economic contracts (having signed documents applying for extension of payment terms, having committed to perform the contractual obligations, having signed document approving revenues, expenditures or the final settlement of credits and debts related to the performance of these economic contracts…).
- The competent persons have directly used assets or profits earned from the signing and performance of the economic contracts (having used cars for travel and/or business, which, to their knowledge, have been obtained from the signing and/or performance of these economic contracts; having used working offices obtained from the signing and/or performance of economic contracts on property lease…).
In summary, according to the provisions of the law, if the branch has not been authorized by Company B, the contract (transaction) signed by the Branch is still valid in the following cases: Company B recognizes or agrees on the contract; Company Bknows it without objection within a reasonable period of time; Company B makes a mistake that it does not know or is not able to know that the branch enters into and performs the civil transaction.
Lawyer Nguyễn Công Tín – FDVN Law Firm
CONTACT US:
Lawyers in Da Nang:
99 Nguyen Huu Tho, Quan Hai Chau, Da Nang city
Lawyers in Hue:
56A Dien Bien Phu, Hue City, Thua Thien Hue
336 Phan Chu Trinh, Hue City, Thua Thien Hue
Lawyers in Phu Quoc:
65 Hung Vuong, Duong Dong town, Phu Quoc island district
Lawyers in Quang Ngai:
359 Nguyen Du, Quang Ngai City, Quang Ngai Province.
Lawyers in Ha Noi
Room 501, 5th Floor, No. 11, Lane No. 183, Dang Tien Dong Street, Dong Da District, Ha Noi
Lawyers in Nghe An
No. 19 V.I Lenin street, Vinh City, Nghe An Province
Website: www.fdvn.vn www.fdvnlawfirm.vn www.diendanngheluat.vn www.tuvanphapluatdanang.com
Email: fdvnlawfirm@gmail.com luatsulecao@gmail.com
Phone: 0935 643 666 – 0906 499 446
Fanpage LUẬT SƯ FDVN: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirm/
Legal Service For Expat: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirmvietnam/
TỦ SÁCH NGHỀ LUẬT: https://www.facebook.com/SayMeNgheLuat/
DIỄN ĐÀN NGHỀ LUẬT: https://www.facebook.com/groups/saymengheluat/
Other Articles
- THỦ TỤC CẤP ĐỔI, CẤP LẠI THẺ THƯỜNG TRÚ CHO NGƯỜI NƯỚC NGOÀI TẠI VIỆT NAM / PROCEDURES FOR REPLACEMENT, REISSUANCE OF PERMANENT RESIDENCE CARDS FROM JULY 1, 2026
- LAW SCHOOL FOR EVERYONE BY PROFESSOR EDWARD K.CHENG, JOSEPH L. HOFFMANN, MOLLY BISHOP SHADEL AND PETER SMITH
- HƯỚNG DẪN CÁCH TÍNH ƯU ĐÃI THUẾ THU NHẬP CÁ NHÂN ĐỐI VỚI CHUYÊN GIA, NHÀ KHOA HỌC LÀM VIỆC TRONG LĨNH VỰC KHỞI NGHIỆP SÁNG TẠO / GUIDANCE ON CALCULATING PERSONAL INCOME TAX INCENTIVES FOR EXPERTS AND SCIENTISTS WORKING IN THE FIELD OF INNOVATIVE STARTUPS
- LAW SCHOOL FOR EVERYONE LEGISLATION AND REGULATION BY PROFESSOR PETER J.SMITH
- SINH CON THỨ HAI TỪ NGÀY 01/7/2026: THỜI GIAN NGHỈ VÀ CÁCH TÍNH TIỀN THAI SẢN / SECOND CHILDBIRTH FROM JULY 1, 2026: MATERNITY LEAVE PERIOD AND CALCULATION OF MATERNITY BENEFITS
- LAW SCHOOL FOR EVERYONE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW BY PROFESSOR ERIC BERGER
- TỔNG HỢP TỪ VỰNG VÀ THUẬT NGỮ PHÁP LÝ TIẾNG ANH THÔNG DỤNG DÀNH CHO HÔN NHÂN GIA ĐÌNH
- LAW SCHOOL FOR EVERYONE CONTRACTS BY PROFESSOR DAVID HORTON
- LAW SCHOOL FOR EVERYONE CORPORATE LAW BY PROFESSOR GEORGE S. GEIS
- TỔNG HỢP 08 BẢN ÁN CỦA TOÀ ÁN VƯƠNG QUỐC ANH VỀ TRANH CHẤP LIÊN QUAN ĐẾN DỮ LIỆU CÁ NHÂN / COLLECTION OF 08 UK COURT JUDGMENTS ON DISPUTES RELATING TO PERSONAL DATA
- TỔNG HỢP 12 BẢN ÁN CỦA TOÀ ÁN SINGAPORE VỀ TRANH CHẤP CÔNG NGHỆ VÀ SỞ HỮU TRÍ TUỆ / 12 SINGAPORE COURTS JUDGMENTS ON TECHNOLOGY AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DISPUTES
- TỔNG HỢP MỘT SỐ MẪU ĐƠN KHỞI KIỆN DÂN SỰ TRÊN THẾ GIỚI / COLLECTION OF CIVIL STATEMENT OF CLAIM TEMLATES FROM OVER THE WORLD
- BỘ TÀI LIỆU HƯỚNG DẪN THỦ TỤC HÀNH CHÍNH VỀ ĐĂNG KÝ QUYỀN TÁC GIẢ, QUYỀN LIÊN QUAN CỦA CỤC CÔNG NGHIỆP VĂN HOÁ VÀ BẢN QUYỀN TÁC GIẢ - BỘ VĂN HOÁ, THỂ THAO VÀ DU LỊCH
- THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PLAYBOOK: POWERS, RESPONSIBILITES AND INTERACTIONS BETWEEN SHAREHOLDERS, BOARD AND MANAGEMENT BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC
- ĐÀ NẴNG: DOANH NGHIỆP CẦN HOÀN THÀNH KÊ KHAI THÔNG TIN CHỦ SỞ HỮU HƯỞNG LỢI TRƯỚC NGÀY 30/11/2026 THEO CÔNG VĂN 14848/STC-DN&ĐKKD
- BÀI HỌC TIẾNG ANH PHÁP LÝ: APPEAL



