When dealing with a contract dispute, particularly in the case of an oral contract, one may hear the term “statute of frauds” used. This does not refer to the commission of an actual fraud, but rather, whether the contract had to be in writing or not. So what is the statute of frauds and when does it apply?
As mentioned, the statute of frauds refers to the requirement that certain kinds of contracts be “memorialized” (i.e., written down) in a signed document that clearly outlines the agreement. Traditionally, the statute of frauds requires a signed writing for marriage contracts, prenuptial agreements, contracts that cannot be completely performed within one year, contracts transferring rights to land, contracts by the executor of a will to pay a debt with his/her own money, contracts for the sale of goods in excess of $500, or surety agreements. Law students often remember these categories using the mnemonic device “MY LEGS" (Marriage, Year, Land, Executor, Goods, Surety).
The term “statute of frauds” comes, as so many American laws do, from England. An Act of the Parliament of England called An Act for Prevention of Frauds and Perjuries required certain agreements to be in writing in order to avoid the possibility of fraud and perjured testimony at trials regarding these transactions. It has passed into modern American law both through the common law and, later, through the enactment of the provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC).
A defendant in a statute of frauds case who wishes to use it as a defense must raise the defense in a timely manner, typically in the pleadings. In most jurisdictions, the actual burden of proving that a written contract exists only comes into play when a Statute of Frauds defense is raised by the defendant (though most courts will anticipate this issue and expect a written agreement in most contract dispute cases). Often, even if the original writing has been lost or stolen, if the defendant admits that it once existed he may be barred from raising the statute of frauds as a defense.
In some cases, the statute of frauds may also be unavailable if partial performance has occurred. Indeed, in most jurisdictions, good faith performance by one party will lead to liability by the other party, regardless of a written contract, under equitable “quasi-contract” theories such as quantum meruit and unjust enrichment. Similarly, an agreement may be enforced even if it does not comply with the statute of frauds if it complies with the Merchant Confirmation Rule. This rule, found in the UCC, states that if one merchant sends a writing sufficient to satisfy the statute of frauds to another merchant, and the receiving merchant knows, or should know, about the contents of the written confirmation but fails to object within 10 days, the confirmation is sufficient to satisfy the writing/signing requirements of both parties. Some jurisdictions also recognize promissory estoppel when the party raising the statute of frauds has caused the other party to detrimentally rely on the otherwise unenforceable, unwritten agreement.
It is often too late to deal with the statute of frauds after something has gone wrong. That is why it is critical to consider these issues when an agreement is being made, not later. Talk to an attorney about the requirements of any agreement falling under the MY LEGS categories noted above. If, however, you are already embroiled in a dispute in which the statute of frauds has become an issue, you will certainly need the assistance of a skilled attorney with experience in both litigation and contract / commercial law in order to make the best of what may be a difficult case.
Provided by HG.org
CONTACT US:
Lawyers in Da Nang:
99 Nguyen Huu Tho, Quan Hai Chau, Da Nang city
Lawyers in Hue:
56A Dien Bien Phu, Hue City, Thua Thien Hue
336 Phan Chu Trinh, Hue City, Thua Thien Hue
Lawyers in Phu Quoc:
65 Hung Vuong, Duong Dong town, Phu Quoc island district
Lawyers in Quang Ngai:
359 Nguyen Du, Quang Ngai City, Quang Ngai Province.
Lawyers in Ha Noi:
Room 501, 5th Floor, No. 11, Lane No. 183, Dang Tien Dong Street, Dong Da District, Ha Noi
Lawyers in Nghe An:
No. 19 V.I Lenin street, Vinh City, Nghe An Province
Website: www.fdvn.vn www.fdvnlawfirm.vn www.diendanngheluat.vn www.tuvanphapluatdanang.com
Email: fdvnlawfirm@gmail.com luatsulecao@gmail.com
Phone: 0935 643 666 – 0906 499 446
Fanpage LUẬT SƯ FDVN: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirm/
Legal Service For Expat: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirmvietnam/
TỦ SÁCH NGHỀ LUẬT: https://www.facebook.com/SayMeNgheLuat/
DIỄN ĐÀN NGHỀ LUẬT: https://www.facebook.com/groups/saymengheluat/
Other Articles
- PHÂN BIỆT TIÊU CHUẨN VIỆT NAM VÀ QUY CHUẨN KỸ THUẬT VIỆT NAM / DISTINGUISHING VIETNAMESE STANDARDS AND VIETNAMESE TECHNICAL REGULATIONS
- MỘT SỐ ĐIỂM MỚI CỦA LUẬT THUẾ TIÊU THỤ ĐẶC BIỆT 2025 / NEW POINTS OF THE LAW ON EXCISE TAX 2025
- LEARNING ENGLISH WITH FDVN LAWFIRM: BÀI TẬP NGỮ PHÁP TIẾNG ANH IELTS CƠ BẢN
- THÔNG TƯ SỐ 38/2026/TT-BTC CỦA BỘ TÀI CHÍNH: QUY ĐỊNH MẪU VĂN BẢN, BÁO CÁO VỀ ĐẦU TƯ RA NƯỚC NGOÀI CÓ HIỆU LỰC TỪ NGÀY 15/04/2026
- CẤU TRÚC IN CASE
- HỢP ĐỒNG CHUYỂN NHƯỢNG QUYỀN SỬ DỤNG ĐẤT VÔ HIỆU DO NHẦM LẪN, GIẢ TẠO TRONG GIAO DỊCH DÂN SỰ: TỒN TẠI VÀ KIẾN NGHỊ HOÀN THIỆN
- CÓ THỂ SỬ DỤNG BITCOIN LÀM PHƯƠNG TIỆN THANH TOÁN TẠI VIỆT NAM HAY KHÔNG? / CAN BITCOIN BE USED AS A MEANS OF PAYMENT IN VIETNAM?
- INFOGRAPHIC 08 TRƯỜNG HỢP ĐƯỢC TẠM HOÃN GỌI NHẬP NGŨ / INFOGRAPHIC 08 CASES POSTPONEMENT FROM CONSCRIPTION
- BÀI HỌC TIẾNG ANH PHÁP LÝ: ARRANGE
- NGHỊ QUYẾT 15/2026/NQ-CP VỀ VIỆC TẠM NGƯNG HIỆU LỰC NGHỊ ĐỊNH SỐ 46/2026/NĐ-CP NGÀY 26/01/2026 VÀ NGHỊ QUYẾT SỐ 66.13/2026/NQ-CP NGÀY 27/01/2026 CỦA CHÍNH PHỦ
- NGHỊ ĐỊNH 103/2026/NĐ-CP QUY ĐỊNH VỀ ĐẦU TƯ RA NƯỚC NGOÀI CÓ HIỆU LỰC TỪ NGÀY 03/04/2026
- PHÂN BIỆT GET SOMETHING DONE VÀ HAVE SOMETHING DONE
- TRƯNG CẦU GIÁM ĐỊNH BỔ SUNG TRONG TỐ TỤNG HÌNH SỰ VIỆT NAM / SUPPLEMENTARY EXPERT EXAMINATION IN VIETNAMESE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
- BRING ĐI VỚI GIỚI TỪ GÌ?
- CẤU TRÚC IT IS NO USE
- THE ISSUE OF JUDGMENT DEBTORS WITHOUT CONDITIONS FOR ENFORCEMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LEGAL IMPROVEMENT / VẤN ĐỀ NGƯỜI PHẢI THI HÀNH ÁN KHÔNG ĐỦ ĐIỀU KIỆN THI HÀNH ÁN VÀ KIẾN NGHỊ HOÀN THIỆN PHÁP LUẬT



