When dealing with a contract dispute, particularly in the case of an oral contract, one may hear the term “statute of frauds” used. This does not refer to the commission of an actual fraud, but rather, whether the contract had to be in writing or not. So what is the statute of frauds and when does it apply?
As mentioned, the statute of frauds refers to the requirement that certain kinds of contracts be “memorialized” (i.e., written down) in a signed document that clearly outlines the agreement. Traditionally, the statute of frauds requires a signed writing for marriage contracts, prenuptial agreements, contracts that cannot be completely performed within one year, contracts transferring rights to land, contracts by the executor of a will to pay a debt with his/her own money, contracts for the sale of goods in excess of $500, or surety agreements. Law students often remember these categories using the mnemonic device “MY LEGS" (Marriage, Year, Land, Executor, Goods, Surety).
The term “statute of frauds” comes, as so many American laws do, from England. An Act of the Parliament of England called An Act for Prevention of Frauds and Perjuries required certain agreements to be in writing in order to avoid the possibility of fraud and perjured testimony at trials regarding these transactions. It has passed into modern American law both through the common law and, later, through the enactment of the provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC).
A defendant in a statute of frauds case who wishes to use it as a defense must raise the defense in a timely manner, typically in the pleadings. In most jurisdictions, the actual burden of proving that a written contract exists only comes into play when a Statute of Frauds defense is raised by the defendant (though most courts will anticipate this issue and expect a written agreement in most contract dispute cases). Often, even if the original writing has been lost or stolen, if the defendant admits that it once existed he may be barred from raising the statute of frauds as a defense.
In some cases, the statute of frauds may also be unavailable if partial performance has occurred. Indeed, in most jurisdictions, good faith performance by one party will lead to liability by the other party, regardless of a written contract, under equitable “quasi-contract” theories such as quantum meruit and unjust enrichment. Similarly, an agreement may be enforced even if it does not comply with the statute of frauds if it complies with the Merchant Confirmation Rule. This rule, found in the UCC, states that if one merchant sends a writing sufficient to satisfy the statute of frauds to another merchant, and the receiving merchant knows, or should know, about the contents of the written confirmation but fails to object within 10 days, the confirmation is sufficient to satisfy the writing/signing requirements of both parties. Some jurisdictions also recognize promissory estoppel when the party raising the statute of frauds has caused the other party to detrimentally rely on the otherwise unenforceable, unwritten agreement.
It is often too late to deal with the statute of frauds after something has gone wrong. That is why it is critical to consider these issues when an agreement is being made, not later. Talk to an attorney about the requirements of any agreement falling under the MY LEGS categories noted above. If, however, you are already embroiled in a dispute in which the statute of frauds has become an issue, you will certainly need the assistance of a skilled attorney with experience in both litigation and contract / commercial law in order to make the best of what may be a difficult case.
Provided by HG.org
CONTACT US:
Lawyers in Da Nang:
99 Nguyen Huu Tho, Quan Hai Chau, Da Nang city
Lawyers in Hue:
56A Dien Bien Phu, Hue City, Thua Thien Hue
336 Phan Chu Trinh, Hue City, Thua Thien Hue
Lawyers in Phu Quoc:
65 Hung Vuong, Duong Dong town, Phu Quoc island district
Lawyers in Quang Ngai:
359 Nguyen Du, Quang Ngai City, Quang Ngai Province.
Lawyers in Ha Noi:
Room 501, 5th Floor, No. 11, Lane No. 183, Dang Tien Dong Street, Dong Da District, Ha Noi
Lawyers in Nghe An:
No. 19 V.I Lenin street, Vinh City, Nghe An Province
Website: www.fdvn.vn www.fdvnlawfirm.vn www.diendanngheluat.vn www.tuvanphapluatdanang.com
Email: fdvnlawfirm@gmail.com luatsulecao@gmail.com
Phone: 0935 643 666 – 0906 499 446
Fanpage LUẬT SƯ FDVN: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirm/
Legal Service For Expat: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirmvietnam/
TỦ SÁCH NGHỀ LUẬT: https://www.facebook.com/SayMeNgheLuat/
DIỄN ĐÀN NGHỀ LUẬT: https://www.facebook.com/groups/saymengheluat/
Other Articles
- CHẾ ĐỘ TÀI SẢN CỦA VỢ CHỒNG THEO THỎA THUẬN TRONG HÔN NHÂN CÓ YẾU TỐ NƯỚC NGOÀI / AGREEMENT ON MATRIMONIAL PROPERTY REGIME IN MARRIAGES INVOLVING FOREIGN ELEMENTS
- LEGAL ENGLISH FOR LAW STUDENT BY TIRA NUR FITRIA S.PD., M.PD.
- AN INTRODUCTION TO LAW BY PHIL HARRIS
- NGHỊ ĐỊNH 212/2026/NĐ-CP QUY ĐỊNH VỀ ĐIỀU KIỆN NĂNG LỰC HOẠT ĐỘNG XÂY DỰNG, HỆ THỐNG THÔNG TIN, CƠ SỞ DỮ LIỆU QUỐC GIA VỀ HOẠT ĐỘNG XÂY DỰNG CÓ HIỆU LỰC TỪ NGÀY 01/07/2026
- BASIC LEGAL ENGLISH BY LE THI NGA (UNIVERSITY OF LAW - HUE UNIVERSITY)
- MODERN LEGAL ENGLISH: A HANDBOOK FOR LAW STUDENTS BY SK BOSE (ADVOCATE & PROFESSOR-LAW)
- TỔNG HỢP 10 MẪU HỢP ĐỒNG NHƯỢNG QUYỀN QUỐC TẾ / COLLECTION OF 10 INTERNATIONAL FRANCHISE AGREEMENT TEMPLATES
- NGHỊ QUYẾT 12/2026/NQ-HĐND NGÀY 02 THÁNG 06 NĂM 2026 CỦA HỘI ĐỒNG NHÂN DÂN THÀNH PHỐ HÀ NỘI VỀ VIỆC CẮT GIẢM THỦ TỤC HÀNH CHÍNH LĨNH VỰC ĐĂNG KÝ DOANH NGHIỆP TRÊN ĐỊA BÀN THÀNH PHỐ HÀ NỘI
- TỔNG HỢP 08 BẢN ÁN CỦA CÁC TOÀ ÁN VƯƠNG QUỐC ANH VỀ TRANH CHẤP GIỮA CÁC CỔ ĐÔNG CÔNG TY / COLLECTION OF 08 JUDGMENTS OF THE COURTS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM CORCERNING BETWEEN SHAREHOLDERS
- BÀI HỌC TIẾNG ANH PHÁP LÝ: IMPACT
- TỔNG HỢP 90 ÁN LỆ SONG NGỮ VIỆT - ANH / COLLECTION OF 90 BILINGUAL CASE LAWS
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 83/2026/AL VỀ TRÁCH NHIỆM BỒI THƯỜNG CỦA DOANH NGHIỆP BẢO HIỂM KHI CƠ QUAN CÓ THẨM QUYỀN CHƯA XÁC ĐỊNH ĐƯỢC NGƯỜI GÂY RA THIỆT HẠI VỀ TÀI SẢN / CASE LAW NO. 83/2026/AL ON THE INDEMNIFICATION LIABILITY OF AN INSURANCE ENTERPRISE WHERE THE COMPETEN
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 84/2026/AL VỀ CHẤM DỨT VIỆC NUÔI CON NUÔI LÀ NGƯỜI CHƯA THÀNH NIÊN KHI NGƯỜI NHẬN CON NUÔI LÀ NGƯỜI ĐỘC THÂN CHẾT / CASE LAW NO. 84/2026/AL ON TERMINATION OF THE ADOPTIVE RELATIONSHIP WITH A MINOR ADOPTEE WHERE THE SINGLE ADOPTIVE PARENT DIES
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 85/2026/AL VỀ VIỆC THAM GIA TỐ TỤNG CỦA DOANH NGHIỆP BẢO HIỂM THÀNH VIÊN THEO HỢP ĐỒNG NGUYÊN TẮC ĐỒNG BẢO HIỂM / CASE LAW NO. 85/2026/AL ON THE PARTICIPATION IN PROCEEDINGS OF MEMBER INSURANCE ENTERPRISES UNDER A CO-INSURANCE FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 86/2026/AL VỀ SỰ KIỆN PHÁP LÝ LÀM PHÁT SINH CĂN CỨ ĐỂ XEM XÉT KHÁNG NGHỊ THEO THỦ TỤC TÁI THẨM / CASE LAW NO. 86/2026/AL ON A LEGAL EVENT GIVING RISE TO GROUNDS FOR CONSIDERATION OF A PROTEST UNDER REOPENING PROCEDURES
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 87/2026/AL VỀ THỨ TỰ ƯU TIÊN THANH TOÁN KHI XỬ LÝ TÀI SẢN BẢO ĐẢM / CASE LAW NO. 87/2026/AL ON PRIORITY OF PAYMENT UPON ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY ASSETS



