When dealing with a contract dispute, particularly in the case of an oral contract, one may hear the term “statute of frauds” used. This does not refer to the commission of an actual fraud, but rather, whether the contract had to be in writing or not. So what is the statute of frauds and when does it apply?
As mentioned, the statute of frauds refers to the requirement that certain kinds of contracts be “memorialized” (i.e., written down) in a signed document that clearly outlines the agreement. Traditionally, the statute of frauds requires a signed writing for marriage contracts, prenuptial agreements, contracts that cannot be completely performed within one year, contracts transferring rights to land, contracts by the executor of a will to pay a debt with his/her own money, contracts for the sale of goods in excess of $500, or surety agreements. Law students often remember these categories using the mnemonic device “MY LEGS" (Marriage, Year, Land, Executor, Goods, Surety).
The term “statute of frauds” comes, as so many American laws do, from England. An Act of the Parliament of England called An Act for Prevention of Frauds and Perjuries required certain agreements to be in writing in order to avoid the possibility of fraud and perjured testimony at trials regarding these transactions. It has passed into modern American law both through the common law and, later, through the enactment of the provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC).
A defendant in a statute of frauds case who wishes to use it as a defense must raise the defense in a timely manner, typically in the pleadings. In most jurisdictions, the actual burden of proving that a written contract exists only comes into play when a Statute of Frauds defense is raised by the defendant (though most courts will anticipate this issue and expect a written agreement in most contract dispute cases). Often, even if the original writing has been lost or stolen, if the defendant admits that it once existed he may be barred from raising the statute of frauds as a defense.
In some cases, the statute of frauds may also be unavailable if partial performance has occurred. Indeed, in most jurisdictions, good faith performance by one party will lead to liability by the other party, regardless of a written contract, under equitable “quasi-contract” theories such as quantum meruit and unjust enrichment. Similarly, an agreement may be enforced even if it does not comply with the statute of frauds if it complies with the Merchant Confirmation Rule. This rule, found in the UCC, states that if one merchant sends a writing sufficient to satisfy the statute of frauds to another merchant, and the receiving merchant knows, or should know, about the contents of the written confirmation but fails to object within 10 days, the confirmation is sufficient to satisfy the writing/signing requirements of both parties. Some jurisdictions also recognize promissory estoppel when the party raising the statute of frauds has caused the other party to detrimentally rely on the otherwise unenforceable, unwritten agreement.
It is often too late to deal with the statute of frauds after something has gone wrong. That is why it is critical to consider these issues when an agreement is being made, not later. Talk to an attorney about the requirements of any agreement falling under the MY LEGS categories noted above. If, however, you are already embroiled in a dispute in which the statute of frauds has become an issue, you will certainly need the assistance of a skilled attorney with experience in both litigation and contract / commercial law in order to make the best of what may be a difficult case.
Provided by HG.org
CONTACT US:
Lawyers in Da Nang:
99 Nguyen Huu Tho, Quan Hai Chau, Da Nang city
Lawyers in Hue:
56A Dien Bien Phu, Hue City, Thua Thien Hue
336 Phan Chu Trinh, Hue City, Thua Thien Hue
Lawyers in Phu Quoc:
65 Hung Vuong, Duong Dong town, Phu Quoc island district
Lawyers in Quang Ngai:
359 Nguyen Du, Quang Ngai City, Quang Ngai Province.
Lawyers in Ha Noi:
Room 501, 5th Floor, No. 11, Lane No. 183, Dang Tien Dong Street, Dong Da District, Ha Noi
Lawyers in Nghe An:
No. 19 V.I Lenin street, Vinh City, Nghe An Province
Website: www.fdvn.vn www.fdvnlawfirm.vn www.diendanngheluat.vn www.tuvanphapluatdanang.com
Email: fdvnlawfirm@gmail.com luatsulecao@gmail.com
Phone: 0935 643 666 – 0906 499 446
Fanpage LUẬT SƯ FDVN: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirm/
Legal Service For Expat: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirmvietnam/
TỦ SÁCH NGHỀ LUẬT: https://www.facebook.com/SayMeNgheLuat/
DIỄN ĐÀN NGHỀ LUẬT: https://www.facebook.com/groups/saymengheluat/
Other Articles
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 90/2026/AL VỀ THẨM QUYỀN HỦY GIẤY CHỨNG NHẬN QUYỀN SỬ DỤNG ĐẤT CỦA TÒA ÁN / CASE LAW NO. 90/2026/AL RE: ON THE COURT’S AUTHORITY TO REVOKE A LAND USE RIGHTS CERTIFICATE
- TỔNG LƯỢC 08 ÁN LỆ MỚI NHẤT CÓ HIỆU LỰC TỪ NGÀY 01/7/2026 / OVERVIEW OF 8 NEW CASE LAWS EFFECTIVE FROM JULY 1, 2026
- LEARNING LEGAL ENGLISH WITH FDVN LAW FIRM: WHILST AND WHILE
- THỜI HẠN GIAO NỘP TÀI LIỆU, CHỨNG CỨ TRONG VỤ ÁN DÂN SỰ / TIME LIMIT FOR SUBMISSION OF DOCUMENTS AND EVIDENCE IN CIVIL CASES
- THỜI ĐIỂM NỘP VĂN BẢN TRÌNH BÀY Ý KIẾN CỦA BỊ ĐƠN VỀ NỘI DUNG KHỞI KIỆN CỦA NGUYÊN ĐƠN / TIME LIMIT FOR A DEFENDANT TO SUBMIT A WRITTEN STATEMENT OF OPINION ON THE PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS
- NGƯỜI LAO ĐỘNG ỦY QUYỀN CHO CÁ NHÂN KHÁC NHẬN LƯƠNG THÌ CÓ CẦN CÔNG CHỨNG, CHỨNG THỰC VĂN BẢN ỦY QUYỀN KHÔNG? / IS NOTARIZATION OR CERTIFICATION REQUIRED WHEN AN EMPLOYEE AUTHORIZES ANOTHER PERSON TO RECEIVE SALARY ON HIS/HER BEHALF?
- TỔNG HỢP 12 MẪU HỢP ĐỒNG HỢP TÁC CỦA MỘT SỐ QUỐC GIA TRÊN THẾ GIỚI / COLLECTION OF 12 COOPERATION AGREEMENTS FROM VARIOUS COUNTRIES AROUND THE WORLD
- TỔNG HỢP MỘT SỐ BÀI BÁO PHÁP LÝ QUỐC TẾ VỀ BẢO VỆ DỮ LIỆU / COLLECTION INTERNATIONAL ARTICLES ON DATA PROTECTION
- PHÂN BIỆT GIÁM HỘ & ĐẠI DIỆN TRONG DÂN SỰ / DISTINCTION BETWEEN GUARDIANSHIP & CIVIL REPRESENTATION
- ĐIỀU KIỆN, HỒ SƠ VÀ TRÌNH TỰ CÔNG NHẬN, CHO THI HÀNH BẢN ÁN LY HÔN CỦA TÒA ÁN NƯỚC NGOÀI TẠI VIỆT NAM
- TRÁCH NHIỆM KHI KHÔNG CHẤP HÀNH QUYẾT ĐỊNH THI HÀNH ÁN / LIABILITIES UPON FAILURE OF COMPLIANCE WITH ENFORCEMENT DECISION
- KHÔNG NHƯỜNG ĐƯỜNG CHO XE RẼ PHẢI CÓ BỊ PHẠT KHÔNG? / IS FAILURE TO YIELD TO VEHICLES TURNING RIGHT FINED?
- BỒI THƯỜNG KHI NGỘ ĐỘC THỰC PHẨM / COMPENSATION UPON FOOD POISONING
- TỰ CẢI TẠO NHÀ CHUNG CƯ THEO SỞ THÍCH CỦA MÌNH THÌ CÓ ĐƯỢC HAY KHÔNG? / IT IS POSSIBLE TO RENOVATE THE APARTMENT ACCORDING TO THE OWNER’S PREFERENCES?
- TRÁCH NHIỆM XE TẬP LÁI KHI GÂY RA TAI NẠN / RESPONSIBILITIES OF VEHICLES FOR TRAINING UPON ACCIDENT
- TỔNG HỢP 100 TỪ VỰNG VÀ CỤM TỪ TIẾNG ANH PHÁP LÝ THÔNG DỤNG



