I am the plaintiff in a civil case. The trial case is coming soon. At the first instance trial, if I withdraw the petition, will I have to pay the court fee? Who will have the authority to make a decision if I withdraw in this case? Hope your company will respond soon.
FDVN’s opinion:
Sincerely thank you for your concerning our legal consulting service. We are glad to give you our advice on your question.
[1]. About civil court fee when withdrawing petition at the trial:
According to the information provided by you, you are the plaintiff who withdraws the entire petition as prescribed at Point c, Clause 1, Article 217 of the Law on Civil Procedure 2015.
Accordingly, Clause 3 Article 218 of the 2015 Civil Procedure Code provides as follows:
"3. In cases where the Court issue decisions to terminate the resolution of civil lawsuits because the litigators withdraw all petitions for lawsuit initiation as provided for in point c and other cases specified in points d, dd, e and g clause 1 Article 217 of this Code, the Court fee advance money paid by the involved parties shall be refunded to the payers."
And Clause 3 Article 18 of Resolution No. 326/2016 / LHBTVQH14 on December 30th, 2016 of the National Assembly Standing Committee stipulating the levels of collection, exemption, reduction, collection, remittance, management and use of legal costs and court regulations: “In cases where the Court issue decisions to terminate the resolution of civil lawsuits because the litigators withdraw all petitions for lawsuit initiation as provided for in point c and clause 1 Article 217 of Civil Procedure Code, the Court fee advance money paid by the involved parties shall be refunded to the payers”.
In Section II.3 of Official Dispatch No. 64 / TANDTC-PC 2019 on Announce results of online answers to a number of questions about criminal, civil and administrative proceedings issued by the Supreme People's Court:
"It must be understood that Clause 3, Article 218 of the Law on Civil Procedure 2015 and Clause 3, Article 18 of Resolution 326/2016/UBTVQH14 are applied for the trial preparation stage or at the trial. It cannot be applied the same procedure for the appellate and first-instance trial as it would be set up the heavier legal obligations for the litigant. Therefore, in case of suspension of the first-instance trial due to the plaintiff withdrawing the entire petition, whether before the opening of the trial or at the first-instance trial, the plaintiff will still be refunded the court fee. The litigants do not have to pay first-instance court fees."
Therefore, when you withdraw the entire petition at the first instance trial, you will still be refunded the court fee and not have to pay the first-instance court fee.
[2]. Regarding the competence to issue decisions to suspend the case:
Article 219 of the Code of Civil procedure stipulates the authority to issue a decision to suspend the resolution of civil cases, specifically:
“1. Before the opening of the trial, the Judges who are assigned to resolve the civil lawsuits shall be competent to issue decisions to suspend/resume/terminate the resolution of such civil lawsuits.
2. In the Court session, the trial panels shall be competent to issue decisions to terminate/resume/terminate the resolution of the civil lawsuits.”
Besides, Official Letter No. 64/TANDTC-PC 2019 on the results of online answers to a number of questions regarding criminal, civil and administrative proceedings issued by the Supreme People's Court:
"So is the trial opening date considered" at the trial "? Section 2, Chapter XIV of the Civil Procedure Code prescribes the procedure for starting the trial. Under the provisions of this Section, the trial begins with the procedure "Opening of the trial" (Article 239). Therefore, until the opening date of the trial (convened) but not yet opened the trial, it is not considered to be "the beginning of the trial" and not yet to be "at the trial". If the plaintiff submits an application to withdraw the lawsuit request before the opening of the trial, the judge is still competent to issue a decision to suspend the resolution of the case and not the Trial Panel."
Thus, at the trial (that is, the opening of the trial), the Trial panel is competent to issue a decision to suspend the resolution of the civil case if you withdraw the petition.
Above are the advice of FDVN Limited Law Firm base on studying law provisions and theories. We hope that our opinions would be useful.
Legal Expert: Nguyen Thi Suong
FDVN Law Company
CONTACT US
Lawyers in Da Nang:
99 Nguyen Huu Tho, Quan Hai Chau, Da Nang city
Lawyers in Hue:
336 Phan Chu Trinh, Hue City, Thua Thien Hue
Lawyers in Phu Quoc:
65 Hung Vuong, Duong Dong town, Phu Quoc island district
Lawyers in Quang Ngai:
359 Nguyen Du, Quang Ngai City, Quang Ngai Province.
Website: www.fdvn.vn www.tuvanphapluatdanang.com
Email: fdvnlawfirm@gmail.com luatsulecao@gmail.com
Phone: 0935 643 666 - 0906 499 446
Fanpage: https://www.facebook.com/fdvnlawfirm/
Other Articles
- BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY (ABRIDGED TENTH EDITION) BY BRYAN A.GARNER
- CẤU TRÚC “NOT ONLY … BUT ALSO …”
- THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE DEAL: THE STRUCTURES THAT DEFINES A DECADE OF GLOBAL M&A BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC
- ACADEMIC LEGAL WRITING: LAW REVIEW ARTICLES, STUDENT NOTES, SEMINAR PAPERS, AND GETTING ON LAW REVIEW BY EUGENE VOLOKH
- THE CONTRACT COMPASS BASIS PRINCIPLES FOR DRAFTING AND READING EVERY AGREEMENT BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC
- CÔNG VĂN 7751/BNG-LS CỦA BỘ NGOẠI GIAO NGÀY 03 THÁNG 09 NĂM 2026 VỀ VIỆC TRIỂN KHAI THỰC HIỆN CÔNG ƯỚC APOSTILLE
- PRIVATE M&A NEGOTIATION A PRACTITIONER'S COMPANION TO THE SHARE PURCHASE, SUBSCRIPTION & SHAREHOLDER'S AGREEMENT BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC
- LITIGATION IN TWO WORLDS CIVIL AND CORMMERCIAL COURT PROCEDURE IN VIETNAM AND THE UNITED STATES: A PRACTITIONER'S COMPARATIVE GUIDE BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC
- HƯỚNG DẪN THỰC HIỆN LUẬT THƯƠNG MẠI ĐIỆN TỬ VÀ NGHỊ ĐỊNH 248/2026/NĐ-CP
- THE M&A DICTIONARY BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC
- THE CAMBRIDGE HANDBOOK OF PRIVATE LAW AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE EDITED BY ERNEST LIM AND PHILLIP MORGAN
- ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EDITED BY JYH-AN LEE, RETO M HILTY, AND KUNG-CHUNG LIU
- ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE LAW CYBERCRIME AND CRIMINAL LIABILITY EDITED BY DENNIS J. BAKER AND PAUL H. ROBINSON
- ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN LEGAL SYSTEMS (BRIDGING LAW AND TECHNOLOGY THROUGH AI) EDITED BY ERIONA CELA, NARASIMHA RAO VAJJHALA AND BEHROUZ ASLANI
- NGHỊ ĐỊNH 342/2026/NĐ-CP QUY ĐỊNH CHI TIẾT LUẬT THƯƠNG MẠI VÀ LUẬT QUẢN LÝ NGOẠI THƯƠNG VỀ HOẠT ĐỘNG MUA BÁN HÀNG HOÁ VÀ HOẠT ĐỘNG LIÊN QUAN TRỰC TIẾP ĐẾN MUA BÁN HÀNG HOÁ CỦA NHÀ ĐẦU TƯ NƯỚC NGOÀI, TỔ CHỨC KINH TẾ CÓ VỐN ĐẦU TƯ NƯỚC NGOÀI TẠI VIỆT NAM
- THE LAW OF INTERNATIONAL LAWYERS BY WOUTER WERNER, MARIEKE DE HOON AND ALEXIS GALÁN



