(1).jpg)
Legal situation: My family filed a lawsuit against the People’s Committee of Province K requesting the annulment of an unlawful administrative decision. The administrative judgment was issued in 2024 and has already taken legal effect; however, up to now the losing party has not complied with the obligations stated in the judgment. Where should I carry out the enforcement procedures in order to protect the lawful rights and interests of my family? I would appreciate the lawyer’s advice.
FDVN’s opinion:
Thank you for submitting your question to FDVN Law Firm (“FDVN”). After reviewing the relevant legal provisions, FDVN would like to provide the following information:
According to the current legal regulations, judgments and decisions of the Court in administrative cases contain different obligations of the party subject to enforcement, including property-related obligations such as court fees, compensation for damages, return of property, and other obligations such as annulment of an administrative decision, maintaining the administrative decision, etc. Pursuant to Clause 1 Article 3 of Decree No. 71/2016/NĐ-CP, enforcement of administrative judgments means the enforcement of judgments and decisions of the Court in administrative cases as prescribed in Article 309 of the Law on Administrative Procedures, except for decisions regarding the property part in the judgment or decision of the Court in an administrative case.
According to the guidance in Clause 4 Article 1 of Joint Circular No. 11/2016/TTLT-BTP-TANDTC-VKSNDTC, for judgments and decisions of the Court in administrative cases, the Head of the civil judgment enforcement authority shall only accept and issue a decision on enforcement with respect to the property obligations such as court fees, compensation for damages, return of property, or return of land that are specifically declared in the Court’s judgment or decision. Other contents of the judgment or decision shall be implemented in accordance with the provisions of the law on administrative procedures.
Under Article 311 of the Law on Administrative Procedures 2015 (as amended and supplemented in 2025), for other contents of the judgment such as the Court declaring the annulment, amendment, or revocation of an administrative decision or requiring the termination of an administrative act, the administrative authority (the losing party) must execute the judgment. The time limits for enforcement are as follows:
(i) The person responsible for enforcement must execute the judgment or decision immediately from the date of receipt of the Court’s judgment or decision in the following cases:
- Where the Court’s judgment or decision requires the authority responsible for compiling the voter list to amend or supplement the voter list, the person responsible for enforcement must implement such amendment or supplementation immediately upon receipt of the Court’s judgment or decision.
- Where the Court issues a decision applying interim urgent measures, the person subject to such measures must implement the decision immediately upon receipt.
(ii) The person responsible for enforcement must execute the Court’s judgment or decision within 30 days from the date of receipt of the Court’s judgment or decision in the following cases:
- Where the Court’s judgment or decision does not accept the request for annulment of an administrative decision, a disciplinary dismissal decision, a complaint settlement decision regarding a decision handling a competition case, or the voter list, the parties must continue to implement the administrative decision, disciplinary dismissal decision, complaint settlement decision regarding a decision handling a competition case, complaint settlement decision in state audit activities, and the voter list in accordance with the law.
- Where the Court’s judgment or decision annuls all or part of an administrative decision, a complaint settlement decision regarding a decision handling a competition case, or a complaint settlement decision in state audit activities, the annulled decision or the annulled part of the decision shall no longer have legal effect. The parties shall rely on the rights and obligations determined in the Court’s judgment or decision to execute it.
- Where the Court’s judgment or decision annuls a disciplinary dismissal decision, the disciplinary dismissal decision shall no longer have legal effect. The head of the authority or organization that issued the disciplinary dismissal decision must implement the Court’s judgment or decision.
- Where the Court’s judgment or decision declares that an administrative act already carried out is unlawful, the person responsible for enforcement must cease carrying out such administrative act from the date of receipt of the Court’s judgment or decision.
- Where the Court’s judgment or decision declares that the failure to perform duties or official tasks is unlawful, the person responsible for enforcement must perform such duties or official tasks in accordance with the law from the date of receipt of the Court’s judgment or decision.
According to Article 312 of the Law on Administrative Procedures 2015, as amended and supplemented in 2025, and Article 11 of Decree No. 71/2016/NĐ-CP, if the enforcement time limit has expired and the person responsible for enforcement still fails to implement the judgment, the person entitled to enforcement has the right to submit a request to the Court that conducted the first-instance trial to issue a decision compelling the enforcement of the Court’s judgment or decision. The person entitled to enforcement may personally or authorize another person to request the Court to issue a decision compelling administrative judgment enforcement by directly submitting an application, presenting the request orally, sending the application via postal service, or by other forms in accordance with the law.
Accordingly, with respect to the obligation to compensate for damages, you may contact the civil judgment enforcement authority to request enforcement. For other contents, such as the Court’s decision annulling an administrative decision, the administrative authority (the losing party) must execute the judgment. If the delay in enforcement affects the lawful rights and interests of your family, you may submit a written request to the Court that conducted the first-instance trial requesting that the authority which issued the unlawful decision that has been annulled be compelled to enforce the judgment with respect to this content.
The above is FDVN’s advisory opinion regarding your request based on the review of the relevant legal provisions. We hope that FDVN’s advice will be useful to you.
FDVN’s Lawyer

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Articles
- THỦ TỤC CẤP ĐỔI, CẤP LẠI THẺ THƯỜNG TRÚ CHO NGƯỜI NƯỚC NGOÀI TẠI VIỆT NAM / PROCEDURES FOR REPLACEMENT, REISSUANCE OF PERMANENT RESIDENCE CARDS FROM JULY 1, 2026
- LAW SCHOOL FOR EVERYONE BY PROFESSOR EDWARD K.CHENG, JOSEPH L. HOFFMANN, MOLLY BISHOP SHADEL AND PETER SMITH
- HƯỚNG DẪN CÁCH TÍNH ƯU ĐÃI THUẾ THU NHẬP CÁ NHÂN ĐỐI VỚI CHUYÊN GIA, NHÀ KHOA HỌC LÀM VIỆC TRONG LĨNH VỰC KHỞI NGHIỆP SÁNG TẠO / GUIDANCE ON CALCULATING PERSONAL INCOME TAX INCENTIVES FOR EXPERTS AND SCIENTISTS WORKING IN THE FIELD OF INNOVATIVE STARTUPS
- LAW SCHOOL FOR EVERYONE LEGISLATION AND REGULATION BY PROFESSOR PETER J.SMITH
- SINH CON THỨ HAI TỪ NGÀY 01/7/2026: THỜI GIAN NGHỈ VÀ CÁCH TÍNH TIỀN THAI SẢN / SECOND CHILDBIRTH FROM JULY 1, 2026: MATERNITY LEAVE PERIOD AND CALCULATION OF MATERNITY BENEFITS
- LAW SCHOOL FOR EVERYONE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW BY PROFESSOR ERIC BERGER
- TỔNG HỢP TỪ VỰNG VÀ THUẬT NGỮ PHÁP LÝ TIẾNG ANH THÔNG DỤNG DÀNH CHO HÔN NHÂN GIA ĐÌNH
- LAW SCHOOL FOR EVERYONE CONTRACTS BY PROFESSOR DAVID HORTON
- LAW SCHOOL FOR EVERYONE CORPORATE LAW BY PROFESSOR GEORGE S. GEIS
- TỔNG HỢP 08 BẢN ÁN CỦA TOÀ ÁN VƯƠNG QUỐC ANH VỀ TRANH CHẤP LIÊN QUAN ĐẾN DỮ LIỆU CÁ NHÂN / COLLECTION OF 08 UK COURT JUDGMENTS ON DISPUTES RELATING TO PERSONAL DATA
- TỔNG HỢP 12 BẢN ÁN CỦA TOÀ ÁN SINGAPORE VỀ TRANH CHẤP CÔNG NGHỆ VÀ SỞ HỮU TRÍ TUỆ / 12 SINGAPORE COURTS JUDGMENTS ON TECHNOLOGY AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DISPUTES
- TỔNG HỢP MỘT SỐ MẪU ĐƠN KHỞI KIỆN DÂN SỰ TRÊN THẾ GIỚI / COLLECTION OF CIVIL STATEMENT OF CLAIM TEMLATES FROM OVER THE WORLD
- BỘ TÀI LIỆU HƯỚNG DẪN THỦ TỤC HÀNH CHÍNH VỀ ĐĂNG KÝ QUYỀN TÁC GIẢ, QUYỀN LIÊN QUAN CỦA CỤC CÔNG NGHIỆP VĂN HOÁ VÀ BẢN QUYỀN TÁC GIẢ - BỘ VĂN HOÁ, THỂ THAO VÀ DU LỊCH
- THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PLAYBOOK: POWERS, RESPONSIBILITES AND INTERACTIONS BETWEEN SHAREHOLDERS, BOARD AND MANAGEMENT BY HERMAN, HENRY & DOMINIC
- ĐÀ NẴNG: DOANH NGHIỆP CẦN HOÀN THÀNH KÊ KHAI THÔNG TIN CHỦ SỞ HỮU HƯỞNG LỢI TRƯỚC NGÀY 30/11/2026 THEO CÔNG VĂN 14848/STC-DN&ĐKKD
- BÀI HỌC TIẾNG ANH PHÁP LÝ: APPEAL



