(1).jpg)
Legal situation: My family filed a lawsuit against the People’s Committee of Province K requesting the annulment of an unlawful administrative decision. The administrative judgment was issued in 2024 and has already taken legal effect; however, up to now the losing party has not complied with the obligations stated in the judgment. Where should I carry out the enforcement procedures in order to protect the lawful rights and interests of my family? I would appreciate the lawyer’s advice.
FDVN’s opinion:
Thank you for submitting your question to FDVN Law Firm (“FDVN”). After reviewing the relevant legal provisions, FDVN would like to provide the following information:
According to the current legal regulations, judgments and decisions of the Court in administrative cases contain different obligations of the party subject to enforcement, including property-related obligations such as court fees, compensation for damages, return of property, and other obligations such as annulment of an administrative decision, maintaining the administrative decision, etc. Pursuant to Clause 1 Article 3 of Decree No. 71/2016/NĐ-CP, enforcement of administrative judgments means the enforcement of judgments and decisions of the Court in administrative cases as prescribed in Article 309 of the Law on Administrative Procedures, except for decisions regarding the property part in the judgment or decision of the Court in an administrative case.
According to the guidance in Clause 4 Article 1 of Joint Circular No. 11/2016/TTLT-BTP-TANDTC-VKSNDTC, for judgments and decisions of the Court in administrative cases, the Head of the civil judgment enforcement authority shall only accept and issue a decision on enforcement with respect to the property obligations such as court fees, compensation for damages, return of property, or return of land that are specifically declared in the Court’s judgment or decision. Other contents of the judgment or decision shall be implemented in accordance with the provisions of the law on administrative procedures.
Under Article 311 of the Law on Administrative Procedures 2015 (as amended and supplemented in 2025), for other contents of the judgment such as the Court declaring the annulment, amendment, or revocation of an administrative decision or requiring the termination of an administrative act, the administrative authority (the losing party) must execute the judgment. The time limits for enforcement are as follows:
(i) The person responsible for enforcement must execute the judgment or decision immediately from the date of receipt of the Court’s judgment or decision in the following cases:
- Where the Court’s judgment or decision requires the authority responsible for compiling the voter list to amend or supplement the voter list, the person responsible for enforcement must implement such amendment or supplementation immediately upon receipt of the Court’s judgment or decision.
- Where the Court issues a decision applying interim urgent measures, the person subject to such measures must implement the decision immediately upon receipt.
(ii) The person responsible for enforcement must execute the Court’s judgment or decision within 30 days from the date of receipt of the Court’s judgment or decision in the following cases:
- Where the Court’s judgment or decision does not accept the request for annulment of an administrative decision, a disciplinary dismissal decision, a complaint settlement decision regarding a decision handling a competition case, or the voter list, the parties must continue to implement the administrative decision, disciplinary dismissal decision, complaint settlement decision regarding a decision handling a competition case, complaint settlement decision in state audit activities, and the voter list in accordance with the law.
- Where the Court’s judgment or decision annuls all or part of an administrative decision, a complaint settlement decision regarding a decision handling a competition case, or a complaint settlement decision in state audit activities, the annulled decision or the annulled part of the decision shall no longer have legal effect. The parties shall rely on the rights and obligations determined in the Court’s judgment or decision to execute it.
- Where the Court’s judgment or decision annuls a disciplinary dismissal decision, the disciplinary dismissal decision shall no longer have legal effect. The head of the authority or organization that issued the disciplinary dismissal decision must implement the Court’s judgment or decision.
- Where the Court’s judgment or decision declares that an administrative act already carried out is unlawful, the person responsible for enforcement must cease carrying out such administrative act from the date of receipt of the Court’s judgment or decision.
- Where the Court’s judgment or decision declares that the failure to perform duties or official tasks is unlawful, the person responsible for enforcement must perform such duties or official tasks in accordance with the law from the date of receipt of the Court’s judgment or decision.
According to Article 312 of the Law on Administrative Procedures 2015, as amended and supplemented in 2025, and Article 11 of Decree No. 71/2016/NĐ-CP, if the enforcement time limit has expired and the person responsible for enforcement still fails to implement the judgment, the person entitled to enforcement has the right to submit a request to the Court that conducted the first-instance trial to issue a decision compelling the enforcement of the Court’s judgment or decision. The person entitled to enforcement may personally or authorize another person to request the Court to issue a decision compelling administrative judgment enforcement by directly submitting an application, presenting the request orally, sending the application via postal service, or by other forms in accordance with the law.
Accordingly, with respect to the obligation to compensate for damages, you may contact the civil judgment enforcement authority to request enforcement. For other contents, such as the Court’s decision annulling an administrative decision, the administrative authority (the losing party) must execute the judgment. If the delay in enforcement affects the lawful rights and interests of your family, you may submit a written request to the Court that conducted the first-instance trial requesting that the authority which issued the unlawful decision that has been annulled be compelled to enforce the judgment with respect to this content.
The above is FDVN’s advisory opinion regarding your request based on the review of the relevant legal provisions. We hope that FDVN’s advice will be useful to you.
FDVN’s Lawyer

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Articles
- CHẾ ĐỘ TÀI SẢN CỦA VỢ CHỒNG THEO THỎA THUẬN TRONG HÔN NHÂN CÓ YẾU TỐ NƯỚC NGOÀI / AGREEMENT ON MATRIMONIAL PROPERTY REGIME IN MARRIAGES INVOLVING FOREIGN ELEMENTS
- LEGAL ENGLISH FOR LAW STUDENT BY TIRA NUR FITRIA S.PD., M.PD.
- AN INTRODUCTION TO LAW BY PHIL HARRIS
- NGHỊ ĐỊNH 212/2026/NĐ-CP QUY ĐỊNH VỀ ĐIỀU KIỆN NĂNG LỰC HOẠT ĐỘNG XÂY DỰNG, HỆ THỐNG THÔNG TIN, CƠ SỞ DỮ LIỆU QUỐC GIA VỀ HOẠT ĐỘNG XÂY DỰNG CÓ HIỆU LỰC TỪ NGÀY 01/07/2026
- BASIC LEGAL ENGLISH BY LE THI NGA (UNIVERSITY OF LAW - HUE UNIVERSITY)
- MODERN LEGAL ENGLISH: A HANDBOOK FOR LAW STUDENTS BY SK BOSE (ADVOCATE & PROFESSOR-LAW)
- TỔNG HỢP 10 MẪU HỢP ĐỒNG NHƯỢNG QUYỀN QUỐC TẾ / COLLECTION OF 10 INTERNATIONAL FRANCHISE AGREEMENT TEMPLATES
- NGHỊ QUYẾT 12/2026/NQ-HĐND NGÀY 02 THÁNG 06 NĂM 2026 CỦA HỘI ĐỒNG NHÂN DÂN THÀNH PHỐ HÀ NỘI VỀ VIỆC CẮT GIẢM THỦ TỤC HÀNH CHÍNH LĨNH VỰC ĐĂNG KÝ DOANH NGHIỆP TRÊN ĐỊA BÀN THÀNH PHỐ HÀ NỘI
- TỔNG HỢP 08 BẢN ÁN CỦA CÁC TOÀ ÁN VƯƠNG QUỐC ANH VỀ TRANH CHẤP GIỮA CÁC CỔ ĐÔNG CÔNG TY / COLLECTION OF 08 JUDGMENTS OF THE COURTS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM CORCERNING BETWEEN SHAREHOLDERS
- BÀI HỌC TIẾNG ANH PHÁP LÝ: IMPACT
- TỔNG HỢP 90 ÁN LỆ SONG NGỮ VIỆT - ANH / COLLECTION OF 90 BILINGUAL CASE LAWS
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 83/2026/AL VỀ TRÁCH NHIỆM BỒI THƯỜNG CỦA DOANH NGHIỆP BẢO HIỂM KHI CƠ QUAN CÓ THẨM QUYỀN CHƯA XÁC ĐỊNH ĐƯỢC NGƯỜI GÂY RA THIỆT HẠI VỀ TÀI SẢN / CASE LAW NO. 83/2026/AL ON THE INDEMNIFICATION LIABILITY OF AN INSURANCE ENTERPRISE WHERE THE COMPETEN
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 84/2026/AL VỀ CHẤM DỨT VIỆC NUÔI CON NUÔI LÀ NGƯỜI CHƯA THÀNH NIÊN KHI NGƯỜI NHẬN CON NUÔI LÀ NGƯỜI ĐỘC THÂN CHẾT / CASE LAW NO. 84/2026/AL ON TERMINATION OF THE ADOPTIVE RELATIONSHIP WITH A MINOR ADOPTEE WHERE THE SINGLE ADOPTIVE PARENT DIES
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 85/2026/AL VỀ VIỆC THAM GIA TỐ TỤNG CỦA DOANH NGHIỆP BẢO HIỂM THÀNH VIÊN THEO HỢP ĐỒNG NGUYÊN TẮC ĐỒNG BẢO HIỂM / CASE LAW NO. 85/2026/AL ON THE PARTICIPATION IN PROCEEDINGS OF MEMBER INSURANCE ENTERPRISES UNDER A CO-INSURANCE FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 86/2026/AL VỀ SỰ KIỆN PHÁP LÝ LÀM PHÁT SINH CĂN CỨ ĐỂ XEM XÉT KHÁNG NGHỊ THEO THỦ TỤC TÁI THẨM / CASE LAW NO. 86/2026/AL ON A LEGAL EVENT GIVING RISE TO GROUNDS FOR CONSIDERATION OF A PROTEST UNDER REOPENING PROCEDURES
- ÁN LỆ SỐ 87/2026/AL VỀ THỨ TỰ ƯU TIÊN THANH TOÁN KHI XỬ LÝ TÀI SẢN BẢO ĐẢM / CASE LAW NO. 87/2026/AL ON PRIORITY OF PAYMENT UPON ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY ASSETS



