(1).jpg)
Legal situation: My family filed a lawsuit against the People’s Committee of Province K requesting the annulment of an unlawful administrative decision. The administrative judgment was issued in 2024 and has already taken legal effect; however, up to now the losing party has not complied with the obligations stated in the judgment. Where should I carry out the enforcement procedures in order to protect the lawful rights and interests of my family? I would appreciate the lawyer’s advice.
FDVN’s opinion:
Thank you for submitting your question to FDVN Law Firm (“FDVN”). After reviewing the relevant legal provisions, FDVN would like to provide the following information:
According to the current legal regulations, judgments and decisions of the Court in administrative cases contain different obligations of the party subject to enforcement, including property-related obligations such as court fees, compensation for damages, return of property, and other obligations such as annulment of an administrative decision, maintaining the administrative decision, etc. Pursuant to Clause 1 Article 3 of Decree No. 71/2016/NĐ-CP, enforcement of administrative judgments means the enforcement of judgments and decisions of the Court in administrative cases as prescribed in Article 309 of the Law on Administrative Procedures, except for decisions regarding the property part in the judgment or decision of the Court in an administrative case.
According to the guidance in Clause 4 Article 1 of Joint Circular No. 11/2016/TTLT-BTP-TANDTC-VKSNDTC, for judgments and decisions of the Court in administrative cases, the Head of the civil judgment enforcement authority shall only accept and issue a decision on enforcement with respect to the property obligations such as court fees, compensation for damages, return of property, or return of land that are specifically declared in the Court’s judgment or decision. Other contents of the judgment or decision shall be implemented in accordance with the provisions of the law on administrative procedures.
Under Article 311 of the Law on Administrative Procedures 2015 (as amended and supplemented in 2025), for other contents of the judgment such as the Court declaring the annulment, amendment, or revocation of an administrative decision or requiring the termination of an administrative act, the administrative authority (the losing party) must execute the judgment. The time limits for enforcement are as follows:
(i) The person responsible for enforcement must execute the judgment or decision immediately from the date of receipt of the Court’s judgment or decision in the following cases:
- Where the Court’s judgment or decision requires the authority responsible for compiling the voter list to amend or supplement the voter list, the person responsible for enforcement must implement such amendment or supplementation immediately upon receipt of the Court’s judgment or decision.
- Where the Court issues a decision applying interim urgent measures, the person subject to such measures must implement the decision immediately upon receipt.
(ii) The person responsible for enforcement must execute the Court’s judgment or decision within 30 days from the date of receipt of the Court’s judgment or decision in the following cases:
- Where the Court’s judgment or decision does not accept the request for annulment of an administrative decision, a disciplinary dismissal decision, a complaint settlement decision regarding a decision handling a competition case, or the voter list, the parties must continue to implement the administrative decision, disciplinary dismissal decision, complaint settlement decision regarding a decision handling a competition case, complaint settlement decision in state audit activities, and the voter list in accordance with the law.
- Where the Court’s judgment or decision annuls all or part of an administrative decision, a complaint settlement decision regarding a decision handling a competition case, or a complaint settlement decision in state audit activities, the annulled decision or the annulled part of the decision shall no longer have legal effect. The parties shall rely on the rights and obligations determined in the Court’s judgment or decision to execute it.
- Where the Court’s judgment or decision annuls a disciplinary dismissal decision, the disciplinary dismissal decision shall no longer have legal effect. The head of the authority or organization that issued the disciplinary dismissal decision must implement the Court’s judgment or decision.
- Where the Court’s judgment or decision declares that an administrative act already carried out is unlawful, the person responsible for enforcement must cease carrying out such administrative act from the date of receipt of the Court’s judgment or decision.
- Where the Court’s judgment or decision declares that the failure to perform duties or official tasks is unlawful, the person responsible for enforcement must perform such duties or official tasks in accordance with the law from the date of receipt of the Court’s judgment or decision.
According to Article 312 of the Law on Administrative Procedures 2015, as amended and supplemented in 2025, and Article 11 of Decree No. 71/2016/NĐ-CP, if the enforcement time limit has expired and the person responsible for enforcement still fails to implement the judgment, the person entitled to enforcement has the right to submit a request to the Court that conducted the first-instance trial to issue a decision compelling the enforcement of the Court’s judgment or decision. The person entitled to enforcement may personally or authorize another person to request the Court to issue a decision compelling administrative judgment enforcement by directly submitting an application, presenting the request orally, sending the application via postal service, or by other forms in accordance with the law.
Accordingly, with respect to the obligation to compensate for damages, you may contact the civil judgment enforcement authority to request enforcement. For other contents, such as the Court’s decision annulling an administrative decision, the administrative authority (the losing party) must execute the judgment. If the delay in enforcement affects the lawful rights and interests of your family, you may submit a written request to the Court that conducted the first-instance trial requesting that the authority which issued the unlawful decision that has been annulled be compelled to enforce the judgment with respect to this content.
The above is FDVN’s advisory opinion regarding your request based on the review of the relevant legal provisions. We hope that FDVN’s advice will be useful to you.
FDVN’s Lawyer

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Articles
- NGHỊ ĐỊNH SỐ 320/2026/NĐ-CP SỬA ĐỔI, BỔ SUNG MỘT SỐ ĐIỀU CỦA NGHỊ ĐỊNH 69/2024/NĐ-CP NGÀY 25 THÁNG 6 NĂM 2024 CỦA CHÍNH PHỦ QUY ĐỊNH VỀ ĐỊNH DANH VÀ XÁC THỰC ĐIỆN TỬ
- (BẢN TIẾNG VIỆT) BỘ NGUYÊN TẮC UNIDROIT VỀ TÀI SẢN SỐ VÀ LUẬT TƯ QUỐC TẾ 2023 / UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES ON DIGITAL ASSETS AND PRIVATE LAW 2023
- ĐIỂM MỚI NGHỊ ĐỊNH 96/2026/NĐ-CP HƯỚNG DẪN LUẬT ĐẦU TƯ 2025 CÓ HIỆU LỰC TỪ NGÀY 31/3/2026 / NEW POINTS OF DECREE NO. 96/2026/ND-CP PROVIDING GUIDELINES FOR THE LAW ON INVESTMENT 2025 TAKING EFFECT FROM 31/03/2026
- THÔNG TƯ 05/2026/TT-BNG HƯỚNG DẪN DỊCH QUỐC HIỆU, TÊN CÁC CƠ QUAN, ĐƠN VỊ, CÁC CHỨC DANH LÃNH ĐẠO, CÁN BỘ, CÔNG CHỨC TRONG HỆ THỐNG CHÍNH TRỊ SANG TIẾNG ANH
- TRÌNH TỰ, THỦ TỤC ĐĂNG KÝ KẾT HÔN VÀ LY HÔN VỚI CÔNG DÂN NƯỚC NGOÀI TẠI VIỆT NAM / PROCEDURES FOR MARRIAGE REGISTRATION AND DIVORCE INVOLVING FOREIGN NATIONALS IN VIETNAM
- SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE VERSUS DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT BY STEVEN SHAVELL
- TỔNG HỢP 10 MẪU HỢP ĐỒNG KINH DOANH BẤT ĐỘNG SẢN, KINH DOANH DỊCH VỤ BẤT ĐỘNG SẢN CỦA MỘT SỐ QUỐC GIA TRÊN THẾ GIỚI / COLLECTION OF 10 TEMPLATES OF REAL ESTATE BUSINESS AND REAL ESTATE SERVICE AGREEMENTS FROM COUNTRIES AROUND THE WORLD
- TỔNG HỢP 10 MẪU HỢP ĐỒNG TRONG LĨNH VỰC LAO ĐỘNG TRÊN THẾ GIỚI / COLLECTION OF 10 AGREEMENT TEMPLATES IN LABOR SECTOR WORLDWIDE
- NGHỊ ĐỊNH 293/2026/NĐ-CP HƯỚNG DẪN THỰC THI CÔNG ƯỚC LA HAY NGÀY 05 THÁNG 10 NĂM 1961 VỀ MIỄN HỢP PHÁP HÓA ĐỐI VỚI GIẤY TỜ CÔNG CỦA NƯỚC NGOÀI (CÔNG ƯỚC APOSTILLE)
- TỔNG HỢP 15 BẢN ÁN CỦA TÒA ÁN TỐI CAO SINGAPORE VỀ VIỆC BÁC ĐƠN YÊU CẦU HỦY PHÁN QUYẾT TRỌNG TÀI / COLLECTION OF 15 SINGAPORE SUPREME COURT JUDGMENTS ON THE DISMISSAL OF APPLICATIONS TO SET ASIDE ARBITRAL AWARDS
- BÀI HỌC TIẾNG ANH PHÁP LÝ: ATTEND
- MỨC PHẠT ĐỐI VỚI HÀNH VI XÂM CHIẾM VỈA HÈ VÀ CÁC TRƯỜNG HỢP ĐƯỢC SỬ DỤNG VỈA HÈ TẠM THỜI / FINES FOR PAVEMENT ENCROACHMENT AND CASES ELIGIBLE FOR TEMPORARY PAVEMENT USE
- NGHỊ ĐỊNH 296/2026/NĐ-CP SỬA ĐỔI, BỔ SUNG MỘT SỐ ĐIỀU CỦA NGHỊ ĐỊNH SỐ 168/2025/NĐ-CP NGÀY 30 THÁNG 6 NĂM 2025 CỦA CHÍNH PHỦ VỀ ĐĂNG KÝ DOANH NGHIỆP
- ĐIỀU KIỆN PHÁT SINH QUYỀN TÁC GIẢ ĐỐI VỚI TÁC PHẨM DO TRÍ TUỆ NHÂN TẠO TẠO RA THEO NGHỊ ĐỊNH 134/2026/NĐ-CP / CONDITIONS FOR EMERGENCE OF COPYRIGHT PROTECTION OF AI-GENERATED WORKS UNDER DECREE NO. 134/2026/ND-CP
- HƯỚNG DẪN QUY TRÌNH XÁC THỰC ĐIỆN TỬ ĐỐI VỚI NGƯỜI NỘP HỒ SƠ VÀ NGƯỜI UỶ QUYỀN NỘP HỒ SƠ ĐĂNG KÝ DOANH NGHIỆP CỦA CỤC PHÁT TRIỂN DOANH NGHIỆP TƯ NHÂN VÀ KINH TẾ TẬP THỂ
- THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT AND BUSINESS LAW BY DON MAYER, DANIEL M. WARNER, GEORGE J.SIEDEL, JETHRO K. LIEBERMAN AND ALYSSA ROSE MARTINA



